Would you like to see imported Rick budget models?

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Adam, Phil is nuts, but he's harmless, hahah!
User avatar
beatlefan
Senior Member
Posts: 4345
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 4:13 pm

Post by beatlefan »

NO!!
1973 4001 MG cb fwi
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
philco
Intermediate Member
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 4:59 pm

Post by philco »

Well, regarding cheap and dirty feelings, I may have had one kind more than the other, but that doesn't make it the best/worst or most/least preferred feeling. (How's that for being ambiguous?)

Gibson is such an outrageous ripoff that I guess it's not fair to compare much else of what's out there to it for value. Another point concerning Gibson is they can't copy themselves as well as other companies have copied Gibson. I'd buy the Washburn copy of the ES-335 before I'd buy any of the Gibson/Epiphone versions.

I just looked at a recent bass magazine article on the "10 best basses for under $500". Fender, Peavey, Spector, Washburn, B.C. Rich, and Warwick were represented, but I can't remember seeing anything by Gibson/Epiphone listed. And if it was, the magazine article was lieing.
lshaia
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 6:15 am

Post by lshaia »

Gee, Bob, I don't think I've seen anyone change names in mid-thread before, or are you a different Bob Young who lives in Lima and keeps a summer cottage in Millbury? If so, please give my regards to BobAmpeg and Bobyoung if you ever bump into them.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

Ric did some cheaper / entry level basses ... the 2000 and 3000 series ... bolt on necks and cheaper prices ...

I love my 2030 ... it plays and sounds very nice ... it just ain't as pretty as a 4000 series
philco
Intermediate Member
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 4:59 pm

Post by philco »

The cheaper series would have probably been a success had the bolt-on models included the 4000 series body style.

Many will say that it would take away from the neck-thru RIC basses, but I say it would give players a choice. That philosophy of choice hasn't hurt the fastest growing quality bass manufacturer. If the inclusion of a bolt-on model prevents a potential customer from looking elsewhere for it, then a sale has been saved, not lost.
User avatar
rkbsound
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1205
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:48 pm
Contact:

Post by rkbsound »

Chuck -- I agree regarding your comment about Epiphones. I love my Epi Dot that I picked up a year ago, but it has had two significant repairs already (warranty covered).

One myth about Rick's that I often hear is that they are "delicate" guitars. As the owner of a '66 Rick 335, I can attest that this guitar is not at all delicate.

That guitar has been structurally challenged (beat up on) many times and has never failed me. It's history is visually apparent. I've only owned it since 1985, and it was very rough when I bought it. As a result, I probably don't treat my newer 360 with as much care as I probably should!
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

"That guitar has been structurally challenged (beat up on) many times and has never failed me."

You're not trying hard enough!

Sincerely yours,
Pete Townshend
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”