
1958 Model 345 f-hole position
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
1958 Model 345 f-hole position
It is very interesting to see the placement of the f-hole on this 1958 model 345. It almost touches the middle pickup.


Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
That appears to be the James Burton 381- I think it's technically a 392, but I start to get confused when they get above 381- they don't really follow the normal numbering plan. I'll look it up in a price-list. Not sure if James Burton actually owned it, or just posed with it.
I've had my eye out for this particular guitar for ages.
I've had my eye out for this particular guitar for ages.
Along the thought of "probably made by Roger Rossmeisl himself"... I would think that in 1958 as the new hollowbodies were coming out, he probably had his hands on a great deal of guitars.
He was the chief designer- but that couldn't take up too much time. I assume he took part in Lennon's first 325, and my '58 335 & 345- but unfortunately there's no way to tell. I used to open up my 50's Ricks looking for a signature, but they didn't write much in there in those days.
He was the chief designer- but that couldn't take up too much time. I assume he took part in Lennon's first 325, and my '58 335 & 345- but unfortunately there's no way to tell. I used to open up my 50's Ricks looking for a signature, but they didn't write much in there in those days.
- melibreits
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4081
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 6:00 am
- Contact:
I was off on the proposed number- it's a 384: Thick body, three pickups, & vibrato. A 392 would have been like a 365F with carved top & back (I'm sure they made TONS of those).
Also, in comparing the above guitar to the one James Burton is pictured with- it appears to be the same, but when James has it there's a standard tailpiece, one chrome knob (one fell off), and only two pickups- but there appear to be screw holes for the missing middle one. I'd say the above photo is later- which would indicate that James Burton was only posing with it. ...so where is it now?
Also, in comparing the above guitar to the one James Burton is pictured with- it appears to be the same, but when James has it there's a standard tailpiece, one chrome knob (one fell off), and only two pickups- but there appear to be screw holes for the missing middle one. I'd say the above photo is later- which would indicate that James Burton was only posing with it. ...so where is it now?
- sir_andrew_of_left_coast
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2000 6:38 am
