60's guitar bridges?

Early years of Rickenbacker Guitars prior to and including 1972

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
analogpackrat
Member
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:34 am

Re: 60's guitar bridges?

Post by analogpackrat »

I had the guitar in the shop for a set up and bridge replacement (standard non-roller) shortly after I bought it in 1994. The original bridge has been in the case ever since. This is the first time I've really looked at it since then.

Yes, the nuts are on backwards. The previous owner apparently did that for some reason. I believe the grommets were originally supposed to be on the top side of the bridge, but again the previous owner messed with it. Actually it makes sense to have them on the bottom since what usually happens is that one of the four height adjust screws works loose and rattles. Grommet on the bottom keeps the screw from moving upwards (assuming there is room between the bridge and the bridge plate for the grommet).

grazioso--the difference we're talking about are the faint impressions on the bottom of the u-shaped bridge piece, not the keeper nuts.
If it is to be, it is up to me.
User avatar
sys700
Member
Posts: 290
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:47 am
Contact:

Re: 60's guitar bridges?

Post by sys700 »

The nuts on my 64 Ric are that way too. I don't believe they're on backwards. I think they were stock that way from the factory.
1964 FireGlo 330S (domestic 1997 w/trapeze)
1966 FireGlo 335
1966 FireGlo 330/12
1966 FireGlo 330/12 (Paul W. 360/12OS conversion)
1968 FireGlo 360F
1972 FireGlo 4001
1973 FireGlo 4001
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6957
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 60's guitar bridges?

Post by collin »

bubbasweet wrote:Are the rubber grommets supposed to go underneath the bridge? I always see them on top.. It would make sense.
Top.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Vintage Years - Before 1973”