Possible 12 string design upgrades

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
cmuk
Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:12 am
Contact:

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by cmuk »

I'm fairly sure that some older 12-string, 6-saddle brings had a compensated saddle on either the D or G pair. Didn't Harrison's have this? Can anyone verify?

If the compensated saddles were available as separate components, perhaps you could tweak your bridge set-up to get the best of both worlds?
User avatar
IHeartRics
Member
Posts: 482
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:17 am
Contact:

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by IHeartRics »

My 330/12 seems to be fine with the 6 saddle bridge. The only time I recall having an issue was when I broke the G octive string right before a gig and just replaced it with a single stray string from a music store. I think it's guage was slightly different - can't remember as I was in a hurry and it was some time ago. It worked for the night but it was never quite right. I restrung it with a new set and all was well. Makes me wonder how critical the tolerance is within a set and what each manufacturer's tolerances are. Maybe switching to a different brand might help some people? Who knows.

As for re-stringing with the R tail peice, I do it similar to Paul's method and it seems to do the trick.
Expect nothing and you'll never be disappointed (and I mean that in an optimistic way).
http://www.reverbnation.com/thelowlies
http://www.myspace.com/thelowlies
User avatar
akhv
New member
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:15 am
Contact:

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by akhv »

To those who has intonation problems on 12strings - I wonder how big is intonation deviation on your guitars? On my 370/12 intonation isn't absolutely perfect but stays within 2 or 3 cents on the part of the neck near the body, and less on the rest of the neck (and to me that's definetly not a problem).
brian_l
Junior Member
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 2:18 pm

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by brian_l »

The biggest design upgrade that Rickenbacker could do on a 12 string instrument is to make the neck wider. I know that the 660 has the wider neck, but I would like to see ALL Rick 12 strings available with a wider neck. Some of us don't want a 660. We would LOVE to get a 330 or 360 but with a wider neck to accommodate those of us with larger hands.
xpitt
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:38 pm

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by xpitt »

brian_l wrote:The biggest design upgrade that Rickenbacker could do on a 12 string instrument is to make the neck wider. I know that the 660 has the wider neck, but I would like to see ALL Rick 12 strings available with a wider neck. Some of us don't want a 660. We would LOVE to get a 330 or 360 but with a wider neck to accommodate those of us with larger hands.
Yes :!: :)
User avatar
scoobster28
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 699
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 1:16 pm

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by scoobster28 »

I think I saw a picture of a 360 style guitar with a wider neck. I am sure I have seen them, actually, but I mean one that came from the factory like that. Perhaps an experiment, or a custom order, or something.
User avatar
whojamfan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2552
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:50 am
Contact:

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by whojamfan »

IHeartRics wrote:My 330/12 seems to be fine with the 6 saddle bridge. The only time I recall having an issue was when I broke the G octive string right before a gig and just replaced it with a single stray string from a music store. I think it's guage was slightly different - can't remember as I was in a hurry and it was some time ago. It worked for the night but it was never quite right. I restrung it with a new set and all was well. Makes me wonder how critical the tolerance is within a set and what each manufacturer's tolerances are. Maybe switching to a different brand might help some people? Who knows.

As for re-stringing with the R tail peice, I do it similar to Paul's method and it seems to do the trick.
Mine doesn't intonate well with a standard RIC 12 set, but does just fine with the TI Flat set from POTR.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by JakeK »

Intonation on my V64's 6-saddle is fine with the TI flats or the Curt Mangan roundwounds.
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by jimk »

My 360/12 does fine with either RIC or Curt Mangan strings + factory 6 saddle bridge.
JimK
Folkie
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:23 pm

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by Folkie »

I have my 330/12 strung with D'Addario EXL 150's (.010 to .046), and I have had some intonation problems higher up on the neck on the G-pair, but not enough to contemplate making a major modification to the guitar. I just replaced the low string on the G-pair (an unwound .017) with a wound .020, and this has helped the intonation problems a little. For the record, I just tried a new fireglo 360/12 from off the wall at Sam Ash, and it had the same intonation problems as mine.
User avatar
vynesmusic
Member
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:18 pm
Contact:

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by vynesmusic »

collin wrote:
whojamfan wrote: If you want to talk about improvements, a tailpiece that doesn't make you wish you had 3 arms to string up would be nice.
Image

Aka "third hand"
Yesssss........The TRUE Musicians' Friend....duct tape.....that's how I re-string....
8)
"All these things will be lost in time....like....tears....in rain...."----Roy Batty, Bladerunner
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by jingle_jangle »

So...do those "tapewounds" stay in tune? Mine sound flabby...
User avatar
drumbob
RRF Consultant
Posts: 559
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:50 am

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by drumbob »

The biggest gripe I have is the narrow neck on my 330-12. I don't understand why they don't put the wider 660 neck on all the 12-strings. I love the 330 otherwise, and would have to sell it to buy a 660, which I frankly don't want to do. I wish I could play a proper Asus chord, but I can't.

Next, for heaven's sake, just put the 12 saddle bridge on all the 12s as standard equipment instead of making us have to buy them as an add-on.

I too have had conversations with Chris at POTR and he said the same thing; just play the damn guitar and don't worry about the low E's being a little flat. Think of all the great records made with the guitar in that condition.

In a crowded bar with people more concerned with scoring some action, no one is going to say, "Your low E strings sound flat."
User avatar
fluffy
Intermediate Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:19 am

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by fluffy »

whojamfan wrote:
collin wrote:
whojamfan wrote: If you want to talk about improvements, a tailpiece that doesn't make you wish you had 3 arms to string up would be nice.
Image

Aka "third hand"
Ladies and gentlemen, Red Green on restringing Rickenbackers :lol: :lol:
Ahh, the never ending uses for duct tape............
I'm a Man
I can change (the strings on my 360/12)
If I have to
I guess
:lol: :lol: :lol:
♪♫♪♫I need new strings, these ones have a bunch of dang wrong notes on 'em ♫♪♫♪


http://www.reverbnation.com/#!/thesubtleties
buchrob
Junior Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:14 pm

Re: Possible 12 string design upgrades

Post by buchrob »

If you ever wanted to frustrate a fellow musician long after you're dead and gone, just leave him a 325/12 with a Bigsby in your will with the proviso that the strings have to be changed every month and played in tune to your executor.

But to get serious: I sold, for financial reasons, a 330-12 with toasters at one point a few years ago, acquired a Dean Boca 12-string for $350 as an interim measure/plaything and switched the string/nut/bridge around to match the Ric set-up, and the result was about 90% there at relatively little cost. The neck and bridge match the wider dimensions of the 660 almost exactly.

Well, I wasn't happy with 90%, so I waited for the right 660/12 to come along, not being a fan of tiger-striped wood on my guitars. Now I do have the right one in hand and I can make the following observations:

1. The 12-string Ric saddle gives you more accurate intonaton, but actually at the expense of the 3xx/12 sound. Part of the charm of the older models is that they are just a little out of tune, but not seriously so, at some point on the fret board. BUT, you do have better control over intonation with the 12-saddle design, and don't have to accept things as just the way it is...

2. Part of the "jangle" is that instead of hearing 6-strings in perfect harmony doubled by their octaves or paired strings, you are actually hearing 12 slightly different strings, brought about by the fact that a double-bridge can't intonate perfectly. You can actually increase the "jangle" effect by playing with slightly different string gauges on the same course, such as one 10 and and one 11 for the high E string pair.

I can live with my Boca, but prefer the 660/12. If I were to suggest a new model to Ric, it would be a 650 (wider neck)/12 with 12-saddle. It would certainly ingite a lot more interest in the 650 line, which has long been an underdog, but better priced to compete with the Fender MIA offerings.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”