Vintage Reissue
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Vintage Reissue
So when does a vintage reissue instrument become "Vintage" in its own right?
Re: Vintage Reissue
Judging by the title of this subforum, a vintage reissue produced before 1985 would be a "Vintage Rickenbacker 1954-84."
Of course, many of the popular vintage reissues, such as the 360/12V64, the 1997 SPC, the 4001V63 (and all the limited edition artist models) were produced after 1984, with perhaps a few exceptions (such as the B series).
Probably the closest thing to considering a reissue a "vintage" instrument is that it was among the first of its kind produced -- and it was produced, say, over 25 years ago.
A broader question that would be easier to answer is: How old does an instrument have to be before it is considered "vintage" (whether or not it is a reissue)?
I would guess that the issue of what qualifies an instrument as "vintage" has been discussed before, though I haven't searched for it.
Of course, many of the popular vintage reissues, such as the 360/12V64, the 1997 SPC, the 4001V63 (and all the limited edition artist models) were produced after 1984, with perhaps a few exceptions (such as the B series).
Probably the closest thing to considering a reissue a "vintage" instrument is that it was among the first of its kind produced -- and it was produced, say, over 25 years ago.
A broader question that would be easier to answer is: How old does an instrument have to be before it is considered "vintage" (whether or not it is a reissue)?
I would guess that the issue of what qualifies an instrument as "vintage" has been discussed before, though I haven't searched for it.
- FretlessOnly
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm
Re: Vintage Reissue
My take on vintage is that this status is conferred upon an instrument that pre-dates a major change in production by the manufacturer. For a Fender, we'd have pre-CBS era Fenders as vintage and the rest are just older Fenders. For RIC, you could choose mid-'73 as your cut-off (did the guitars change just like the 4001s at that time?).
Of course, this is all very subjective. If you have a 20-year old vintage re-issue right now, shouldn't it be considered vintage in another 10-20 years? I suppose so; there would have to be running timescales to reflect additional changes in production by the manufacturer and/or you could adopt the DMV/RMV style of approach with 25 years conferring antique status to a car (+/- for guitars).
Of course, this is all very subjective. If you have a 20-year old vintage re-issue right now, shouldn't it be considered vintage in another 10-20 years? I suppose so; there would have to be running timescales to reflect additional changes in production by the manufacturer and/or you could adopt the DMV/RMV style of approach with 25 years conferring antique status to a car (+/- for guitars).
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
Re: Vintage Reissue
It seems 25 years is usually the mark by which "vintage" is applied. Both previous posts point out possible parameters precisely....
- paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Vintage Reissue
IIRC, the standard is twenty-five years.
I have a Vintage Reissue `62 Fender Mary Kaye Stratocaster (that's Fender "Blonde" with gold hardware, NOT PINK), that's as old now as an original 1962 Stratocaster was when I bought my reissue brand new. Judged by the same standard as the original guitar was when it was deemed "vintage" and worthy of a reissue, I would argue that a VRI guitar that's 24-25 years old should also be considered "vintage"
I have a Vintage Reissue `62 Fender Mary Kaye Stratocaster (that's Fender "Blonde" with gold hardware, NOT PINK), that's as old now as an original 1962 Stratocaster was when I bought my reissue brand new. Judged by the same standard as the original guitar was when it was deemed "vintage" and worthy of a reissue, I would argue that a VRI guitar that's 24-25 years old should also be considered "vintage"
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Vintage Reissue
S'matter with youse guys?
Vintage reissues are born vintage.
Tengyooveddymutch.
Vintage reissues are born vintage.
Tengyooveddymutch.
Re: Vintage Reissue
Like Benjamin Button?jingle_jangle wrote:S'matter with youse guys?
Vintage reissues are born vintage.
Tengyooveddymutch.
Re: Vintage Reissue
My 325v59 JG has an October 1984 (XJ) date of manufacture.libratune wrote:... Of course, many of the popular vintage reissues, such as the 360/12V64, the 1997 SPC, the 4001V63 (and all the limited edition artist models) were produced after 1984, with perhaps a few exceptions (such as the B series) ...
BTW, originally "vintage" meant simply the year of production, e.g. "Vintage 1975", and it has 'evolved' into connoting a time frame.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
Re: Vintage Reissue
Interesting, Gary. There are seven 325V59 examples from 1984 on the Register, all October (XJ).doctorwho wrote: My 325v59 JG has an October 1984 (XJ) date of manufacture.
My December 1984 4001V63 (XL) is one of two 1984s listed.
Re: Vintage Reissue
When I got my '66 Rick in 1985, I considered it vintage. It technically wasn't vintage, but it sure was classic! I don't think it plays any better or worse than when I got it. But now it's vintage. Or is it classic vintage?
Re: Vintage Reissue
Nah, nah, it's now a "vintage classic". You got to get that right.rkbsound wrote:But now it's vintage. Or is it classic vintage?
- IHeartRics
- Member
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:17 am
- Contact:
Re: Vintage Reissue
I kind of like the word "Classic" over the word "Vintage". As stated earlier, vintage to me relates more to a specific time or date. Classic to me means its special and timeless.rkbsound wrote:When I got my '66 Rick in 1985, I considered it vintage. It technically wasn't vintage, but it sure was classic! I don't think it plays any better or worse than when I got it. But now it's vintage. Or is it classic vintage?
Expect nothing and you'll never be disappointed (and I mean that in an optimistic way).
http://www.reverbnation.com/thelowlies
http://www.myspace.com/thelowlies
http://www.reverbnation.com/thelowlies
http://www.myspace.com/thelowlies
Re: Vintage Reissue
Ahhh...I think you've hit upon it correctly!Malchik wrote:Nah, nah, it's now a "vintage classic". You got to get that right.rkbsound wrote:But now it's vintage. Or is it classic vintage?
Now, in the last 25 years, has RIC produced a "classic"? I'm thinking perhaps the acoustics. Maybe the C series?
Re: Vintage Reissue
Thats what I was implying.jingle_jangle wrote:S'matter with youse guys?
Vintage reissues are born vintage.
Tengyooveddymutch.