McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Non-Rickenbacker Guitars & Effects

Moderator: jingle_jangle

Post Reply
MaplegloMatt
Junior Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:28 pm

McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by MaplegloMatt »

I just finished listening to the newly re-mastered "McCartney" album (loud..through headphones). Paul's tone on that album is IMHO, perfect. It reminded me that it is what made me want to play bass, made me lust after a Rickenbacker, and makes me keep mine strung with flats.
I know the 4001/3 is capable of many tones and the Squire/Lee/Rotosound tone really put RIC on the map but the sweet, mellow tone of flats on a Rick does it for me.
I'm just sayin'.......
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by woodyng »

and you would be correct! i think that's one of the reasons so many ric bass owners have more than 1. i have 60's maxima flats on my 4000,for a supersmooth resononant tone that still cuts through,and DR sunbeams on my cii for plenty of toppy grind and snap. i love Macca's ric tone he got with the old maxima flats,although i don't "quite" get it with my bass not having the toaster there.
User avatar
fireglo
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 411
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 5:00 am

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by fireglo »

Did you get the booklet that comes with the album? If so, what does it say about the Rickenbacker bass?
MaplegloMatt
Junior Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:28 pm

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by MaplegloMatt »

Unfortunately I didn't have the extra cash to spring for the "deluxe" edition for $59.00. (I already felt foolish for buying this album again in yet another format!) It looks like a hardcover book with (I'm sure) an expanded booklet. I just got the basic 2 CD set. The booklet in that set does not mention Rickenbacker but I've seen a short promo clip on You Tube that appears to have pages from the deluxe edition that mention specific instruments used such as Rickenbacker bass, Martin acoustic and Premier drums. The booklet I got does at least have additional photos including a photo of Paul outside his house in London with his Rickenbacker.
And Woody, you hit the nail on the head....I need to save for a new Rick (4004?) so I can string it with some DR Sunbeams! That would also be a tone worth the quest.
bluewhale
Member
Posts: 362
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:05 pm

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by bluewhale »

I've seen more than one Beatle-era photo of McCartney playing his 4001S with the pickup selector in the down position, I assume to select the bridge pickup.

Is it known whether he recorded that way?
nukebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 6:21 pm

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by nukebass »

Rumor has it that his bass may have been wired "upside down" so that the down position was the neck pickup. Someone should ask him :)
User avatar
johnnysain
Member
Posts: 467
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:00 am

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by johnnysain »

nukebass wrote:Rumor has it that his bass may have been wired "upside down" so that the down position was the neck pickup. Someone should ask him :)
Someone at RIC worked on that bass in 1975. I wonder if John Hall or someone else would know who that was?

And if anyone can recollect any details about the bass (besides the 'wood work' that Paul performed on it).
Rickenbacker player since 1978
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by ken_j »

johnnysain wrote:
nukebass wrote:Rumor has it that his bass may have been wired "upside down" so that the down position was the neck pickup. Someone should ask him :)
Someone at RIC worked on that bass in 1975. I wonder if John Hall or someone else would know who that was?

And if anyone can recollect any details about the bass (besides the 'wood work' that Paul performed on it).
Look here: http://www.thecanteen.com/arnquist.html
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
FretlessOnly
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by FretlessOnly »

Great stuff, Ken.

As for the pickup switch, it is only a rumour about the wiring (as far as I know), but one listen to his tone and you know you're hearing a preponerance of neck toaster as opposed to a horseshoe.
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by johnallg »

FretlessOnly wrote:Great stuff, Ken.

As for the pickup switch, it is only a rumour about the wiring (as far as I know), but one listen to his tone and you know you're hearing a preponerance of neck toaster as opposed to a horseshoe.
That and a LOT of compression.
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by antipodean »

johnallg wrote:
FretlessOnly wrote:Great stuff, Ken.

As for the pickup switch, it is only a rumour about the wiring (as far as I know), but one listen to his tone and you know you're hearing a preponerance of neck toaster as opposed to a horseshoe.
That and a LOT of compression.
And the bass channel of a Bassman or a Vox, depending upon the period.
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
User avatar
FretlessOnly
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by FretlessOnly »

Interesting that you would say that John, as I'm not at all sure about what compression really was in the days when Macca used his 4001S most for the Beatles (Wings is another story) later tracks. Let's say the latter half of '65 through the Lady Madonna/Hey Bulldog sessions in February '68. The one tune that most speaks Rick to me is With a Little Help...; that bass tone is ringing out like a piano - I get no sense of compression on that. I'm wondering what compression was in those days - certainly not a rack-mount or pedal like we see today; more likely a board adjustment. I can hear loads of compression on the 4001S on a track like Baby You're a RIch Man, but not so much on others.
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: McCartney Rickenbacker Tone

Post by johnallg »

John, in fact Paul's basses were run through two compressors (tube based) when he was being recorded.
Post Reply

Return to “Forum 51 - The Quest For Tone: by Mike Snow”