Laredo's pickups position

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
MiroN
Member
Posts: 384
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:22 am
Contact:

Laredo's pickups position

Post by MiroN »

All the 4004L I had seen the same pick up position:
http://www.rickresource.com/register/ga ... =0&month=0

but on Rickenbacker site:
http://www.rickenbacker.com/model.asp?model=4004L
I noticed a different position

why??? :?:
My Basses' Name:
4001White 1981-11-W.
4003Jetglo 1992-04-Mr.B.B.
4001Mapleglo 1974-06-Tre
4004Walnut 1994-09 CI-Giusy
4004Mapleglo 2003-05 CII (Fretless 4-2-5)-Amo
4004Jetglo 1994-12 Laredo-Ruso
4003Mapleglo 1988-08 LK-Lemmy
2030MidnightBlue 1992-08-Nino
User avatar
coolhandjjl
Intermediate Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:42 pm

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by coolhandjjl »

Ahh... the floating 4004 pickup positions. One of the great mysteries of the world right after 'who really shot Kennedy'. You should take a look at all the generations of the 4004LK's. They are all over the place!

I can address the neck pup position- they were initially made as in the Ric photo, but made truss rod removal impossible unless you took a router to the bodies face. So Ric moved the neck pup right up tight to the fretboard for that reason, but never updated the photo. The 4004Cii photo is also incorrect.
'09 4003 | '93 4003s
John Luke aka Coolhand
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by ilan »

The first generation 4004's had the neck pickup against the neck just like the current ones, then it was moved to enable slapping/popping (IIRC this was confirmed in a post by Rickenbacker CEO John Hall), and then moved back to the original position to enable servicing the truss rods.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13218
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by rickenbrother »

If you're as crazy over the 4004's as I am, you'll want at least two of them. Each one having the different pickup position.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by bassduke49 »

The Laredos were born in late 1992 - early 1993 and had the pickups in the "raised" positions with the "neck" pickup right up against the fingerboard. About 1999-2000 when RIC introduced the Cheyenne II, the pickups were "lowered." Right after that, the maple fingerboards were changed over to bubinga (as on the new Cheyenne II). The pickups remained in those positions until sometime in 2004 when, as Ilan says, they were returned to the original position to facilitate truss-rod removal in the event of a failure. There is evidence of at least one Laredo with the lowered pickups and the maple fretboard (a Midnight Blue 4004L that Dane Wilder had).
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
gearhed289
Intermediate Member
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:51 am
Contact:

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by gearhed289 »

ilan wrote:it was moved to enable slapping/popping (IIRC this was confirmed in a post by Rickenbacker CEO John Hall).
I never really got that explanation. It was more "out of the way" when it was right against the end of the fingerboard, especially on a 20 fret bass. But what do I know, I stopped slapping by the end of the 90s! :wink:
'89 4003S, '92 4001CS, '93 4003S/8
www.nomadichorizonband.com
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by cassius987 »

I don't get the slapping comment either. Then again I don't get a lot of comments people make about what makes slapping easy/hard... in my experience, you just do it. It's very easy and natural for me on most basses I've owned, and I don't even like slapping as a primary technique (I still like to bust out MM's "Power" on occasion). I've seen some great slapping done on nearly every kind of bass there is.
guitfiddle
New member
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:49 am

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by guitfiddle »

As a side note, does anybody know about when the pots on the 4004's were switched from 350K to 500K?
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by johnhall »

guitfiddle wrote:As a side note, does anybody know about when the pots on the 4004's were switched from 350K to 500K?
They weren't. They're still the same 330K ones we've always used.
guitfiddle
New member
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:49 am

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by guitfiddle »

johnhall wrote:
guitfiddle wrote:As a side note, does anybody know about when the pots on the 4004's were switched from 350K to 500K?
They weren't. They're still the same 330K ones we've always used.
Thanks, John! I love both of my 4004's and I was just wondering because they sound slightly different. I believe there may have been a recent post somewhere on another thread suggesting that the 4004 had changed pots. Glad you cleared that up! :D
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by johnhall »

guitfiddle wrote:Thanks, John! I love both of my 4004's and I was just wondering because they sound slightly different. I believe there may have been a recent post somewhere on another thread suggesting that the 4004 had changed pots. Glad you cleared that up! :D
It's always been the same pot as used for a 4003. I guess it's possible you have a really old 4004 that might have had the older style but it's unlikely. If they sound different, it's probably the difference in wood and/or setup.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2788
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by henry5 »

Every 4001 I've tried sounds different; same goes for the 4003 (I've only tried 1 4004). I would never expect 2 instruments of a particular model to sound the same. Similar maybe (sometimes not even that), but not the same.
User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by berth »

henry5 wrote:Every 4001 I've tried sounds different; same goes for the 4003 (I've only tried 1 4004). I would never expect 2 instruments of a particular model to sound the same. Similar maybe (sometimes not even that), but not the same.
There is the fun of having several of 1 type imho. (I must admit I have only several of 2 types though.)
68 4001|73 4001 MG|75 4000 MG|81 4001S AZG|86 4003 MID/BT|86 4003 Shadow|88 4003s Blackstar|89 4003 Grey/BT FL|93 4004 Ci|96 4003S/8 FG|98 4003S/5 JG|05 650D|05 4004Cii/5 TG|08 660/12 JG|18 4003S/5 MID|19 4003S/5 WAL ||TR35B|RB 30||
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by johnallg »

Interesting.....

http://www.rickenbacker.com/pdfs/19516.pdf

http://rrf.mcx.net/tech/19516.pdf

My Cheyenne was wired as the second one, with the 500k pot.
Everythinggoes
New member
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 8:15 am
Contact:

Re: Laredo's pickups position

Post by Everythinggoes »

rickenbrother wrote:If you're as crazy over the 4004's as I am, you'll want at least two of them. Each one having the different pickup position.
Do you have just a Laredo or a Cheyenne as well? :)
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”