Martin Trademark

Non-Rickenbacker Guitars & Effects

Moderator: jingle_jangle

Post Reply
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Martin Trademark

Post by ken_j »

According to an article in August's PREMIERGuitar (pg. 25) after 161 years Martin received a trademark on their headstock design. I know there has been numerous guitar companies dating back quite a few years that use the same design. Some companies are still producing guitars with this design. I am curious how this will effect the used market and the effects on companies such as Collings that still produce guitars with this design.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Martin Trademark

Post by electrofaro »

Can one call that headstock a design? Rather the absence of design :roll:
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

Martin Trademark

Post by 8mileshigher »

Interesting that Martin secured their rights on their headstock, so late in the game.

I remember JH had posted an article a year or two ago, about a legal decision and Fender being denied their rights, after so many decades of their own managerial default and not enforcing their own design claims, against all those knock-offs over the decades. IIRC seems that Fender sort of was trapped in the situation of use it or lose it.
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: Martin Trademark

Post by ken_j »

Fender's headstock is close to an early Martin and Bigsby design. Both of these were ahead of Fender in the timeline.
"The best things in life aren't things."
Post Reply

Return to “Forum 51 - The Quest For Tone: by Mike Snow”