Buying a Fireglo 4001 or 4003?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Buying a Fireglo 4001 or 4003?
I'm a bass player and Beatle related instrument collector. I have owned and do own some of the coolest Beatle makes/models they played. However, I have never owned a Rick bass!! I'm in love with some of the beautiful aged looking Fireglo finishes I have seen on different members 4001's and 4003's here. I do like the bound body look. I would like to get members opinions/suggestions on what year, model and pickups would be best if I'd like the Macca tone and Fireglo look. Are the 4001 or 4003 reissues worth looking in to? Your suggestions and help would be appreciated.
-
jwr2
Ron-
See how the fret markers go ALL the way across the fretboard in Andy's pics? The split tailpiece refers to that little slot in the string divider-also in Andy's pics.
Of course Jeff's bass was all 'dat!
The C64S is the closest thing to Sir Paul's bass for us righties. Except for that ridiculous headstock.
The C64 reissue horseshoe is the closest repo of them old shoes. Finding a pristine vintage horseshoe would be difficult-but not impossible.
I still don't think there's all that much difference between the C64 vs V63 tone.
See how the fret markers go ALL the way across the fretboard in Andy's pics? The split tailpiece refers to that little slot in the string divider-also in Andy's pics.
Of course Jeff's bass was all 'dat!
The C64S is the closest thing to Sir Paul's bass for us righties. Except for that ridiculous headstock.
The C64 reissue horseshoe is the closest repo of them old shoes. Finding a pristine vintage horseshoe would be difficult-but not impossible.
I still don't think there's all that much difference between the C64 vs V63 tone.
Buy it before someone else does
- atomic_punk
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
- Contact:





