1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by johnallg »

Am I seeing this right? Is there no chrome left on the tailpiece butt?
Colonel Sanders
Intermediate Member
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:39 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by Colonel Sanders »

A beauty! Enjoy!
1973 4001 Jetglo
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by godber »

johnallg wrote:Am I seeing this right? Is there no chrome left on the tailpiece butt?
That's right John, all chrome gone! I guess that it was pretty flaky anyway and was removed entirely.
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7097
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by scotty »

cool bass mate you must be running out of space !
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by godber »

scotty wrote:cool bass mate you must be running out of space !
Running out of everything Scott!
User avatar
spongebob
Intermediate Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:32 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by spongebob »

Can't beat aged Mapleglow! Great to see the photos of it in action....and still a great bass all these years later.
1974 (February) 4001 JG
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by chefothefuture »

godber wrote:
jps wrote:Very interesting tuning keys on it, late '50s/early '60s?
I'm clueless Jeff - there are holes for slimline grovers underneath.
Image
Those machine heads are likely mid 60s -early 70s Klusons. The non-slotted posts were used
by Guild and Gibson.
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by woodyng »

I like the worn look of the bridge,and the patina on the tuners,too. This is a real treasure piece!
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by aceonbass »

The chrome plating on the aluminum tailpieces was horrible, and has completely come off on that one. I had an NOS one once that had chrome starting to peel on it before it was ever mounted to a bass. They were originally just a two stage plating process using nickel, then chrome. I get these triple plated....copper/nickel/chrome.
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by chefothefuture »

aceonbass wrote:The chrome plating on the aluminum tailpieces was horrible, and has completely come off on that one. I had an NOS one once that had chrome starting to peel on it before it was ever mounted to a bass. They were originally just a two stage plating process using nickel, then chrome. I get these triple plated....copper/nickel/chrome.
I seem to remember you saying it had peed all over the place....
I had a supply of house training pads ready for it's arrival!
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by godber »

Thanks for all the comments guys. I was certainly pleased with the bass from the moment I opened the case, but went into auto-pilot making a shopping list to get stock parts back on it. It is a lovely player and looker so I'm going to leave it as it is, with the exception of the bridge pick-up - the Seymour Duncan sounds too compressed and smooth to me and so I need to look out for a 72 bridge pup, is anyone holding one they would be prepared to sell?
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by wints »

Lovely old aged MG 4001, with history. They do always look uber cool, once they amber out...
User avatar
CatHead
Junior Member
Posts: 133
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:56 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by CatHead »

Another great Rick there, good find sir! Why did Jo not want it anymore?

I dont generally dig MG either but that has aged beautifully.
1975 Ric 480 Jetglo
1980 Ric 4001 BurgundyGlo
1982 Ric 4001 Cream
2002 Ric 4003 BurgundyGlo COTY
2010 Ric 620 FireGlo
2015 Ric 4003S JetGlo
2017 Ric 4003 British Racing Green Ltd Ed
2022 Ric 4005XC Amber FireGlo
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by godber »

CatHead wrote:Another great Rick there, good find sir! Why did Jo not want it anymore?

I dont generally dig MG either but that has aged beautifully.
The shop said he was trading it for a Tom Petty 660/12 string. He already has a nice 360/12 in Fireglo, so he likes his Ricks, but plays more guitar these days.
image.jpg
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Re: 1972 4001 Mapleglo - Jo Burt

Post by ilan »

Cool bass, congrats!
godber wrote: The pickguard damage came from a bottle thrown at Reading festival, which also knocked out the bridge pickup - hence the Seymour Duncan replacement and the reverse mounted plate.
I assume that is what he says, but honestly, I can't see how a bottle can cause that damage, let alone skip aside and knock out the treble pickup. A less heroic, but more reasonable explanation would be that the toaster height adjustment screw was over-tightened and cracked the pickguard in the same exact place as hundreds of other Ric basses, and the bridge pickup was replaced - like hundreds of others - because it was too thin-sounding, and the owner did not know that all it took to solve it was to bypass the evil cap.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”