Refinish or leave as is.

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Colonel Sanders
Intermediate Member
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:39 am

Refinish or leave as is.

Post by Colonel Sanders »

Hi,

A philosophical question for Rickenbacker enthusiasts...

This bass is going to be shipped to Paul W for a refret. I struggle between going for a refinish while being at it or leave it as is.

I kind of like the "mojo" but I also can see myself enjoying a looking like new bass. Resale value wise, is it better to leave it as is or is it better to refinish?

For a Fender, the answer is definitely "leave as is" but I am not sure for a Rick.

Please bear in mind hat I am not seeking for a specific value appraisal here but more a "this way or that way" question (hence not posting in the Rick Appraisal forum).

Image

Image

Image

Image
1973 4001 Jetglo
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
User avatar
T.A.R.
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1413
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:39 am

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by T.A.R. »

The FG is so rich in color the way it is. If it can be matched refin. Beautiful bass!
User avatar
Happyface
Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 2:35 pm

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by Happyface »

Speaking from personal experience (see the Tux in the for sale section), refinishing destroys the value. But it sure does look better, in my eyes.
Currently: Tuxedo, 1972 4000

Past holdings: 1968 4005, Blackstar, 3000, CS, Alembric, Tuxedo, 360-12, Blackstar, 360-12, 1982 4003, Shadow, 4003 SnowGlow, CS in that order.
User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by rickyfricky »

From what I see in the photos, it looks like genuine, bona fide "honest wear". And not enough to detract from its visual appeal.

Our friends at #ender would call this "lightly relic'd".

That being the original finish, I would "Let It Be". 8)

Shine on 'til tomorrow Colonel . . . :wink:
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
Colonel Sanders
Intermediate Member
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:39 am

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by Colonel Sanders »

rickyfricky wrote:From what I see in the photos, it looks like genuine, bona fide "honest wear". And not enough to detract from its visual appeal.

Our friends at #ender would call this "lightly relic'd".

That being the original finish, I would "Let It Be". 8)

Shine on 'til tomorrow Colonel . . . :wink:
It is honest wear. Definitely not by myself...

The previous owner must have slapped the funk out of this bass. The wood and the pickguard is gouged near the G string to a depth of 1 mm.

The Fireglo, combined with the ambering of the varnish made for quite a rich color, that looks even better in person.

And the neck is brilliant. But the frets are totally shot.
1973 4001 Jetglo
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
User avatar
vulcan_creedler
Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:12 am

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by vulcan_creedler »

Definitely leave it as it is! You can't get the old patina back with a refinish, especially as the rest of the hardware will have "age" to it.

I'd consider a replacement pickguard tho! (use the old one as a template, and KEEP it!) - that IS reversible!
"Infamy, Infamy, They've all got it in for me" - Kenneth Williams


1988 JG 4003
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by sloop_john_b »

LEAVE IT
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13207
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by rickenbrother »

I'd leave the finish as it is.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by teeder »

Another "LEAVE IT" vote here.
Colonel Sanders
Intermediate Member
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:39 am

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by Colonel Sanders »

Guys, I think that for once I will not be a contrarian...
1973 4001 Jetglo
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by woodyng »

That deep fireglo is fabulous,and the wear spots are it's badge of honor.the ambering occuring on the CB binding is perfection. I think it is gorgeous as it is. Another vote to leave it as nature intended.
Last edited by woodyng on Mon Feb 04, 2013 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5022
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by kennyhowes »

sloop_john_b wrote:LEAVE IT
YES
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by godber »

I like it very much as it is.

I would also try to get the refret to look like factory, with the frets touching a nub of neck binding and not hanging over the binding.
User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by rickyfricky »

vulcan_creedler wrote:Definitely leave it as it is! You can't get the old patina back with a refinish, especially as the rest of the hardware will have "age" to it.

I'd consider a replacement pickguard tho! (use the old one as a template, and KEEP it!) - that IS reversible!
+1 on a replacement guard.

And maybe a "correct" thumb rest if you can find one. I bought one on the 'Bay recently for "The Cream Puff" -- my '70 4001.
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
User avatar
beatlefan
Senior Member
Posts: 4345
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 4:13 pm

Re: Refinish or leave as is.

Post by beatlefan »

leave it as is....beautiful mojo!!
1973 4001 MG cb fwi
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”