PRS Soundhole Design?

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
Grey
Advanced Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 pm

PRS Soundhole Design?

Post by Grey »

I don't know if this has been brought up before, but isn't this PRS design a direct ripoff of the iconic Rickenbacker "slash" soundhole?
48394_l.jpg
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: PRS Soundhole Design?

Post by jps »

The slash soundhole is not trademarked by RIC, it long predates them.
User avatar
Grey
Advanced Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: PRS Soundhole Design?

Post by Grey »

Really? I thought that was something unique to Rickenbacker.
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: PRS Soundhole Design?

Post by egosheep »

Grey wrote:Really? I thought that was something unique to Rickenbacker.
No, take a look at some old German archtops for instance. Maybe this soundhole was something Roger Rossmeisl learned in the family trade along with the German Carve.
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: PRS Soundhole Design?

Post by paologregorio »

Besides, the sound hole on a PRS isn't the problem; it's the rest of the guitar.

Has anyone ever seen a builder try so hard not to be another brand by essentially designing a guitar that's an amalgamation of inside out silhouettes of every guitar it's trying not to look like?! :mrgreen:
Honestly, do people find that guitar attracttive? I may be biased, but looking at that thing does not want me to think, "ooh, I want to spend my $$ on that!!!"
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: PRS Soundhole Design?

Post by sloop_john_b »

paologregorio wrote:Besides, the sound hole on a PRS isn't the problem; it's the rest of the guitar.

Has anyone ever seen a builder try so hard not to be another brand by essentially designing a guitar that's an amalgamation of inside out silhouettes of every guitar it's trying not to look like?! :mrgreen:
Honestly, do people find that guitar attracttive? I may be biased, but looking at that thing does not want me to think, "ooh, I want to spend my $$ on that!!!"
Don't hold back now. ;)
User avatar
Grey
Advanced Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: PRS Soundhole Design?

Post by Grey »

paologregorio wrote:Has anyone ever seen a builder try so hard not to be another brand by essentially designing a guitar that's an amalgamation of inside out silhouettes of every guitar it's trying not to look like?! :mrgreen:
Honestly, do people find that guitar attracttive? I may be biased, but looking at that thing does not want me to think, "ooh, I want to spend my $$ on that!!!"
It's really not an appealing guitar. Granted it's their low-end model but PRS is at Gearfest every year so i've played even their most expensive products and certainly never felt like I was playing a 4000$ instrument.

That said, there is one PRS guitar I have love affair with.
prs_03_zps02ec3967.jpg
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: PRS Soundhole Design?

Post by jps »

Grey wrote:That said, there is one PRS guitar I have love affair with.
prs_03_zps02ec3967.jpg
Boy have I got a guitar for you! This belongs to a friend of mine who has been on and off the fence about selling it.
User avatar
Grey
Advanced Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: PRS Soundhole Design?

Post by Grey »

jps wrote:Boy have I got a guitar for you! This belongs to a friend of mine who has been on and off the fence about selling it.
Unfortunately that guitar has two things I don't like about PRS, flame tops and complicated inlays. The birds just don't do it for me. :lol:
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: PRS Soundhole Design?

Post by cassius987 »

sloop_john_b wrote:
paologregorio wrote:Besides, the sound hole on a PRS isn't the problem; it's the rest of the guitar.

Has anyone ever seen a builder try so hard not to be another brand by essentially designing a guitar that's an amalgamation of inside out silhouettes of every guitar it's trying not to look like?! :mrgreen:
Honestly, do people find that guitar attracttive? I may be biased, but looking at that thing does not want me to think, "ooh, I want to spend my $$ on that!!!"
Don't hold back now. ;)
:lol:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: PRS Soundhole Design?

Post by jps »

Grey wrote:
jps wrote:Boy have I got a guitar for you! This belongs to a friend of mine who has been on and off the fence about selling it.
Unfortunately that guitar has two things I don't like about PRS, flame tops and complicated inlays. The birds just don't do it for me. :lol:
He can yank the birds out and paint the body for you. :wink: :lol:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”