2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
So I've got my bridge bottomed out, barely any relief in the fretted part of the neck itself, but there is still kinda high action, like the whole neck-thru thing is bowing around the neck joint. Should I try lighter strings? If so, can anyone recommend good ones for a RIHS and scatterwound toasty?
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
Lighter gauge strings will help, but I'd strongly recommend Dane Wilder's (and other's) approach to resolving this problem - get a competent luthier to insert a maple block in the neck pup cavity to sort out that adverse neck angle, It worked for me.
Ash
Ash
1976 4001 "Shadow" Fretless
1978 4002 Walnut
1986 4008 Silver
1999 4001 V63 White
2012 4004 Jetglo
_____________________
Button 6 String Fretfull
Button 6 String Fretless
NS CR5 Omni Bass Fretless
Ashbory Bass
1978 4002 Walnut
1986 4008 Silver
1999 4001 V63 White
2012 4004 Jetglo
_____________________
Button 6 String Fretfull
Button 6 String Fretless
NS CR5 Omni Bass Fretless
Ashbory Bass
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
I had TI Jazz Rounds or the Super Soft set of Chromes when I had my V63. The TI may take a bit of getting used to the very low tension but once you do you may find more typical basss strings feel like they came off of the Golden Gate bridge.
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
Lower tension strings aren't going to fix this problem. What Ashley said.
-
lordblackmore
- New member
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 8:59 am
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
Does this preserve the half inch spacing of the neck pickup?Ashgray wrote:Lighter gauge strings will help, but I'd strongly recommend Dane Wilder's (and other's) approach to resolving this problem - get a competent luthier to insert a maple block in the neck pup cavity to sort out that adverse neck angle, It worked for me.
Ash
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
Since the body wings were moved back several years ago, this area is weaker. John Hall claims that problems like this are rare, but I wouldn't do it.lordblackmore wrote:Does this preserve the half inch spacing of the neck pickup?
- cassius987
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4723
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
+1 -- this worked beautifully for Dan Basica's 4004L. I have to admit I would be skeptical a maple block would do much (my thinking with a bad neck angle is, "The damage is done", in the case of neck-through) were it not for the results I have seen it get.Ashgray wrote:Lighter gauge strings will help, but I'd strongly recommend Dane Wilder's (and other's) approach to resolving this problem - get a competent luthier to insert a maple block in the neck pup cavity to sort out that adverse neck angle, It worked for me.
Ash
- Kopfjaeger
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:49 am
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
Jdog,
On your bass, does it have that "China depth" route for the neck pup? What year is she? +2 on the maple block fix.
Sepp
On your bass, does it have that "China depth" route for the neck pup? What year is she? +2 on the maple block fix.
Sepp
Vintage/Classic Rickenbacker Enthusiast!
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
Yes it will, it fills the hole and then only removes enough timber to fit the pickup and no more..lordblackmore wrote:
Does this preserve the half inch spacing of the neck pickup?
Eden.
I confused Faraday's cage, with Schrodinger's cat box....
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
Thanks everyone. Is there a thread about this?
- Kopfjaeger
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:49 am
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
Jdog,
Yes, but for the life of me I can't remember when or by whom. Mark Walker repaired another v63 with a negative neck angle by partially filling the excessive pup route with a liquid two part epoxy. After putting the instrument on a fixture that pulled the neck angle neutral, he semi filled the void. I know the material he used was one where very little shrinkage would occur. Precision rifle builders use a similar product to embed the actions of their rifles into the stock. While this material is very durable, I like the maple block and re route method better.
Sepp
Yes, but for the life of me I can't remember when or by whom. Mark Walker repaired another v63 with a negative neck angle by partially filling the excessive pup route with a liquid two part epoxy. After putting the instrument on a fixture that pulled the neck angle neutral, he semi filled the void. I know the material he used was one where very little shrinkage would occur. Precision rifle builders use a similar product to embed the actions of their rifles into the stock. While this material is very durable, I like the maple block and re route method better.
Sepp
Vintage/Classic Rickenbacker Enthusiast!
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
[quotePrecision rifle builders use a similar product to embed the actions of their rifles into the stock. While this material is very durable, I like the maple block and re route method better.
][/quote]
+1
I use acraglas for my rifles, but would go the maple block route for basses.
http://www.brownells.com/gunsmith-tools ... d1033.aspx
][/quote]
+1
I use acraglas for my rifles, but would go the maple block route for basses.
http://www.brownells.com/gunsmith-tools ... d1033.aspx
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=412344&p=833988&hil ... ty#p833988jdogric12 wrote:Thanks everyone. Is there a thread about this?
Jeff Scott left a good link about half way down the first page.
Re: 2000 4001V63 needs less tension - right?
I found that while surfing for stuff on the new 4003S.
