jps wrote:Only going by my own former 2004 Cii, the tone of the Laredo is brighter/more aggressive than the Cii which was smoother/darker sounding, to me. That is why I changed out the HB-1s in the Cii for scatterwound toasters. When I first played a Laredo (Ron O'Keefe's) into an amp in 2009 I immediately noticed this difference. Plus, I am not a fan of gold hardware. I swapped out all the gold on my Cii for chrome parts, something I don't have to do with a Laredo. As to the forearm bevel, it has been a long time since having a Cii in my hands but the bevel on my two Laredos seem like they would be very close to encroaching on the walnut "meat" of the body sandwich, but it doesn't appear that way in photos of Ciis so that bevel may not be as angled/deep on the Cii compared to the Laredo.
That's interesting Jeff. The last & only time I played a Laredo (an original one, Jetglo, maple board) was probably well over ten years ago and was through a horrible Peavey rig so I couldn't really tell what it sounded like. All I remember was it had the widest neck I'd played on a Ric at that point. I've played 4 Cheyenne IIs IIRC, one of which had the thickest neck I've ever played on a Ric. I played 2 others when I bought my old one; they were both great, but I preferred the one I bought. I played them side by side and they were very different; mine was light and very stringy-sounding, very open, but with growl. The other was heavier and sounded more "nosey", for want of a better word; more middley. The one I bought sounded tremendous; although it sounded darker than my '72 4001s, as a dedicated light touch pick player I appreciated the extra balls and growl. It sat very differently in the band mix though.
Ironically I prefer gold hardware.
I'd love to see how the rear upper bout contouring compares though.
I wish I could play - or even hear - a Laredo and a Cheyenne II back to back. Does anyone who has had both have any recordings or footage?