4005xc production numbers?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10684
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by jdogric12 »

It's a tad neck divey, so I think an XC as long scale would be a mess.
User avatar
lumgimfong
Member
Posts: 455
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by lumgimfong »

For $5k it better not be neck divey!!!
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10684
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by jdogric12 »

Barely. Not a problem. It's a hollow (semi) bass. Can't have cake and eat it too. I bet if I used a stickier strap I wouldn't have even noticed, but I use the $5 Ernie Ball straps, which I love, but don't do me a whole lot of favors with neck-heavy instruments.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6631
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by aceonbass »

jdogric12 wrote:It's a tad neck divey, so I think an XC as long scale would be a mess.
Yes, if you kept the bridge where it is, and lengthened the neck. If the bridge were moved back instead (and there's plenty of room to do so) the neck would keep its current length while losing 3 or 4 frets. I'd personally like a 32" scale.
TTA
New member
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 2:03 pm

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by TTA »

I also like that the 4005xc is short scale. Long scale would never balance… and i want variety from my 4001/3.

And i like the body. Unique. The original 4005 is just 110% not my thing… where is the 330 is unique and weird and cool. I cant wait to shred it!
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6631
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by aceonbass »

TTA wrote:I also like that the 4005xc is short scale. Long scale would never balance...
This is not true. Please read my previous post.
crawlspacestefan
New member
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:17 pm

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by crawlspacestefan »

I was the second person in Canada on the list with L&M - and still haven't got a call yet. I suspect Rickenbacker hasn't sent any our way yet. :/

TTA wrote:Last week ric facebook said they were making 4005xc’s again.

Any idea how many are being produced? I had my name put on one (the last of maybe 5 fireglo that long and mequade ordered). Also wondering how quickly they pump them out… aka will i get mine in 2023?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 36727
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by jps »

TTA wrote:Long scale would never balance…
This one balanced quite nicely. :mrgreen:
Jeff-1200_0130.jpg
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2804
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by thx1955 »

jdogric12 wrote:Barely. Not a problem. It's a hollow (semi) bass. Can't have cake and eat it too. I bet if I used a stickier strap I wouldn't have even noticed, but I use the $5 Ernie Ball straps, which I love, but don't do me a whole lot of favors with neck-heavy instruments.
I use the same Ernie Ball Straps and have the same issue, neck fairly plunges to the floor if the strap is not restrained, it does play lovely though.
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”