Old to new bridge conversion

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Old to new bridge conversion

Post by cassius987 »

I have a 4003S (fretless conversion) that I really love, but it has the old bridge/tailpiece which I like much less than the new design. Has anyone converted their old Ric to the new bridge/tailpiece? How was the outcome?
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: Old to new bridge conversion

Post by ram »

I did it to my '74 4001. Take the old one off, clean the area. pace the template with existing screws/screw holes and drill the three little new holes. Mount the new hardware and ground wire and restring. Pretty much that easy. There is no tonal or sound difference I could hear. Intonation and string adjustments are far easier with the new one. It looks Ric, sounds Ric and is Ric. I lile it!
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Old to new bridge conversion

Post by cassius987 »

Great, thanks!
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Old to new bridge conversion

Post by cassius987 »

Do others who made the conversion note a difference in tail lift?

On my 4003AC, with the new design, there is no tail lift whatsoever. Now that I can see the difference, it's hard not to notice tail lift with the old design.
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: Old to new bridge conversion

Post by ram »

Yes, that is why I replaced mine. It had developed a little lift a couple of decades ago. It seemed to stabilize for a while then seemed to get active again, showing tiny signs of movement. I was thinking of adding two holes to the tailpiece (like my 4003S5 has but then figured I'd try the new version. No lift at all.
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Old to new bridge conversion

Post by cassius987 »

Awesome! Thanks.
User avatar
nov_1981
Member
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: Old to new bridge conversion

Post by nov_1981 »

I tried the new bridge on my 4003SW converted to fretless and found that I couldn’t get the action as low as the with old bridge. Ended up putting the old one back on.
Attachments
D7A_9110.jpeg
bluewhale
Member
Posts: 362
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:05 pm

Re: Old to new bridge conversion

Post by bluewhale »

Sorry for the slow reply.

I replaced the three-screw bridge/tailpiece on a 4001 C64 with the new V2. I had to make a change because the break angle for the G string passing over the bridge saddle was approaching zero over time. That was three years ago. I posted some pics here:

viewtopic.php?p=874366#p874366

OP asked whether there is a difference in tail-lift. If you look at the design, you'll see that the new tailpiece cannot lift.


bluewhale
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Old to new bridge conversion

Post by cassius987 »

nov_1981 wrote: Fri Apr 26, 2024 6:56 pm I tried the new bridge on my 4003SW converted to fretless and found that I couldn’t get the action as low as the with old bridge. Ended up putting the old one back on.
That's a gorgeous bass!
User avatar
nov_1981
Member
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: Old to new bridge conversion

Post by nov_1981 »

Thanks! Larry Davis does excellent work
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”