08 Ric 4003 wrote:I realize it is subjective, but just because a bassist or guitarist made you or me want to play does makes them a pioneer or innovator on their instrument. Which is a pretty reason to name something after a famous artist. Let's not just name something after anyone who has ever played on a recording, or the list would never end. I know that Slash's Epi is a budget minded guitar for someone who doesn't want to pay 4k for his sig Gibson model, but he doesn't play an Epi. Hell the guitar he used on most of Appetite was not even a Les Paul it was built by Kris Derrig. Look at Gibson they have a sig Les Paul Clapton model. Has Eric ever played a LP yes, is the the axe he is most associated with, NO. My other issue is just with the sheer number if sig models and the over pricing. I like - X -saw them twice, but the Billy Zoom model went for crazy $ and the George Harrison model is 20k MSRP. That is a down payment on a house, or a new car.
I generally agree with your point, and a lot of players seem to get a Sig model because they're the flavor of the day and someone from marketing of Brand X saw them playing a Brand X guitar. The relic models are ridiculous wrt price. Mentioned to Zoom if Gretsch would please offer a Zoom model that wasn't beat up and overpriced-it has some cool features I'd buy if it were a normal Jet price-pinned bridge, highly chambered, different p/ups, as well as some dool cosmetic features unique to that year; plain arrow knobs, block inlays, square lettered, pearloid,, T roof logo- not crazy about his pick of banjo tuners though.
I think Billy Zoom and Brian Setzer both
did innovative things with their instrument; Setzer and Zoom both infused rockabilly, rock and punk into a signature sound in each of their cases; it was unfortunate for Zoom and the rest of the band "X" that their label was completely clueless as how to market them. Setzer was somewhat more traditional, but he still wanted to "punk up this rockabilly thing" as well as infuse it with jazz elements. I didn mention to Zoom at NAMM that Gretsch ought to offer a non-relic model of his guitar that was more affordable, a la the Setzer models that are available-Setzer had a spendy limited edition relic, as well as the "hot rod" model with just one pot for volume, and a switch, and the standard hot rod model-both have a shaved down neck, and some other customized features Setzer had done to his own Gretsches for increased playability. Even if either player hadn't done anything other than play a Gretsch, in the case of those two, I think it would have been cool for them to get a Sig model just as a thank you from Gretsch, and because their particular Gretsch models had some unique features. Harrison's was a spendy relic tribute, but before that one came out there was a standard-non-relic model just like George's available at a normal price from Gretsch, and I spoke with a Gretsch rep at NAMM this year, who said that after all the relics were sold, Gretsch planned to re-introduce a non-relic model like George's, faithful to the original, w/o all of the dings and dents, at a reasonable price.
I agree that relic prices are just plain silly, and I wouldn't buy one. Clapton played a LP for just a short time, though it was probably, IMO, when his playing was more interesting then when he switched to Strats (not a Strat hater-own three of them

)
For the most part I agree with you that Sig models are silly, and WAY overdone!