I not sure why it was reversed, but Capital's art department was responsible for it. Side note, there is some debate about the trunk cover and the butcher cover. Oddly enough, it is believed the trunk cover was taken during an unplanned session two months before the butcher cover. The reason some experts think this is because their hair appears longer on the butcher cover, and no one is sure of the exact dates of the trunk session photos.
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:42 pm
by brammy
Here ya go, Jerry...
Who will be the next person to receive a shamustwin ?
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 7:15 pm
by shamustwin
I'd like to thank the Academy...
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:22 pm
by lyle_from_minneapolis
Flipping a photo to make the text look better...that's a decision they would have made without hesitation back then.
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:08 pm
by servant
brammy wrote:
beat-gen-4948.jpg
Brammy,
Where is the non-Shea photo from? John is wearing a hat for I'm Down, and does not have the badge on his jacket.
(Man I wish I could "quote" the photo... I am referring to top of the four b&w photos from '65.)
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:12 pm
by servant
lyle_from_minneapolis wrote:Flipping a photo to make the text look better...that's a decision they would have made without hesitation back then.
Even as a kid of about 8 years old when I got this, I knew it was wrong.
Four left-handed Beatles:
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:13 am
by beatlefreak
It happened all the time - Even with the Beatles first album (Notice the wristwatches).
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:15 am
by Scastles
servant wrote:
lyle_from_minneapolis wrote:Flipping a photo to make the text look better...that's a decision they would have made without hesitation back then.
Even as a kid of about 8 years old when I got this, I knew it was wrong.
Four left-handed Beatles:
I vividly remember that sleeve. It was impossible to miss the reverse on everyone, except Paul.
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:37 am
by brammy
Where is the non-Shea photo from? John is wearing a hat for I'm Down, and does not have the badge on his jacket.
(Man I wish I could "quote" the photo... I am referring to top of the four b&w photos from '65.)
The answer is "surfin the internet" ..... but good question!!! I dont see that it fell off or anything like that.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Maybe I stumbled across a rehearsal photo or something like that?
Plus, he's wearing a hat.
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:21 am
by brammy
I think that the Beatles wore fairly similar uniforms for both the 65 and 66 concerts. Its a lot harder to find pix form Shea '66. However, in 66 they wore light colored pants while in 65 the pants were dark. I think the non-badged Lennon photo was likely from 66?
Beatles Shea 66:
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:50 am
by brammy
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:14 am
by brammy
Re: Groovy Beatles pictures
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:01 am
by servant
brammy wrote:I think that the Beatles wore fairly similar uniforms for both the 65 and 66 concerts. Its a lot harder to find pix form Shea '66. However, in 66 they wore light colored pants while in 65 the pants were dark. I think the non-badged Lennon photo was likely from 66?
I don't think it's from '66, or at least is not Shea '66. In the video they appear to be wearing more dapper Suits. In the photo of John in the hat, he is wearing the
military tunic-style jacket and dark pants as worn at Shea '65, but without the badge.
brammy wrote:Maybe I stumbled across a rehearsal photo or something like that?
Did you say "rehearsal"?? The Beatles, rehearse? C'mon - John even said something like, "I wrote it; I played it; I sang it. Why do I need to rehearse?" Maybe it is from another night on the '65 tour. They probably didn't do soundchecks too often. Due to the filming, though, it is possible they did some "stand in" for the
film crew to set up for various angles. But, unless it's been cropped, it appears to be dark out. Did they play elsewhere the previous night, or could they have spent some time at Shea to preview their show for the cameras? Interesting concept...