Page 10 of 13
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:15 pm
by mgauction
Paul definitely has some good thoughts on all her comments but is probably gagged by his lawyer as he is looking pretty good to the public and the media for the moment. I bet if he really felt there was potential harm to his daughter he would react real fast. Remember, he talks to Heather every day. I think Heather mixes some real truths with fears/fantasy. Do you think her lawyer is against any of these public comments/interviews? They are looking for public support of any kind.
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:27 pm
by firstbassman
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:09 pm
by mgauction
Good quip. Hope this can help mend his wounds.
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:14 pm
by sloop_john_b
It's on the cover of both NYC tabloids today!
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 4:12 pm
by revolver323
I read the news today, oh boy ....
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:46 am
by studiotwosession
revolver323 wrote:I read the news today, oh boy ....
It says he's traded in the single lefty blonde activist type for a married Republican brunette. The next thing you know he'll be spotted in a steakhouse.
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:05 am
by revolver323
Actually, it says they were spotted in a sushi bar ...
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:28 pm
by miamiric
Following on from Ms Mills recent media assault her law firm Mischcon de Reya have announced today that they no longer represent her in her divorce from Sir Paul McCartney.
Looks like what goes around comes around, it's shaping up to be a great weekend for Sir Paul....YES!!
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 3:26 pm
by revolver323
Unfortunately, given the size of the settlement and the cut her lawyers will get, I doubt she will find it difficult to attract new counsel.
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 4:29 pm
by brammy
Good for Pauly.
And no, I would never be cruel enough to make a snide remark like "at least she has both legs".
THAT would be horrible.
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:23 pm
by congerz83
A perfect time to re-post this......
http://home.att.net/~rhhardinh/imuscut.stumpy.ra
Just a taste of the world-class radio returing to airwaves near you on Dec 3rd.
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 3:15 am
by brammy
50 million pounds?
Whatever that amounts to in greenbacks it's too much. I say she should be given one mil and sent limping down the road. 50 mil? What the hell did she do to deserve that much from Pauly?
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:46 pm
by mgauction
She has probably been the only person, right or wrong, who dared stand up to him since John Lennon. This is a guy that has smoked pot everyday since 1969. The link said that he and Linda never fought -- I'm sure she just took it....quietly. Lennon said he surrounds himself around "yes-men."
"...You live with freaks who tell you, you was king..."
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:19 pm
by revolver323
Some people actually have marriages in which fights don't occur. Unless you or I lived with the Maccas--both marriages--we can only speculate. And sometimes there really is only one "perfect woman" for you. Seems like Paul found her in Linda. Linda didn't necessarily have to "take it": maybe she liked the relationship the way it was. However it was.
Re: McCartney v. McCartney, Can't Get Much Worse?
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:16 pm
by brammy
Nobody ever accused Pauly of having a small ego, thats for sure.