Page 10 of 11

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:20 am
by Colonel Sanders
johnhall wrote: We've previously stated that when this market is fully "cleaned up" we will produce true horseshoe pickups again and our intent hasn't changed. It's only the infringements and attendant legal requirements associated with that which has delayed our program.
Any dates for us regarding reissuing a true horshoe John? Looking at Jason Lollar website, he is not offering any horse shoe anymore. Does this classify as a clean market? If not, what will?

I have 2 4001 I am oh so keen to upgrade...

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:26 pm
by loverickbass
So what was the outcome of the suit?

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:34 pm
by egosheep
loverickbass wrote:So what was the outcome of the suit?
Case info is here, but you need a PACER account to read the files.
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/califo ... 712/561059

Paraphrasing from someone who was able to access the casefile, apparently Lollar has filed a motion to dismiss the suit based on several points. One of which being that RIC can't trademark a functional device that has already been patented. Maybe someone here can access the file and shed some light on it.

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 4:47 am
by Keef
But won't you agree that the company has an obligation - perhaps only moral - to satisfy this demand, if you will not allow others to do so?
Agreed.
Either make them or allow other someone else to do so.

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2014 3:36 pm
by doctorwho
It looks like there was some activity in February:
RIC-v-Lollar.jpg
(my previous comments were in error and I have edited them out)

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:08 am
by cangaroo
Not sure if anyone's still interested, but i've found this :

http://music-electronics-forum.com/t37641/

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 9:41 am
by jdogric12
oooOOOOOooooo!!!!!!!!!!! :)

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 1:20 pm
by woodyng
jdogric12 wrote:oooOOOOOooooo!!!!!!!!!!! :)
Indeed! :mrgreen:

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 1:45 pm
by jdogric12
I just heard from Lollar.
Here is what someone at the company said:
Yes, horseshoes are available on a limited, custom basis. We won’t stock them, but we can build bass and guitar versions to order.
They will be putting something on their site soon.

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:25 pm
by woodyng
Works for me!

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:42 pm
by loverickbass
Whoa! Yes! Jason Lollar is the man.

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 6:57 pm
by egosheep
I wonder what the terms of the settlement were?

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 6:12 am
by Colonel Sanders
I am very happy to see we will have a source for a "true" magnetic horseshoe.

I still hope we will have a genuine Rickenbacker option in the (near?) future.

Hopefully there was a settlement that did advantage both parties.

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 2:06 am
by antipodean
Interesting indeed! I personally prefer the lower-output Lollar HS to the RI HS that came on my V63 - less punch but more clarity and treble response. A better approximation to the one real vintage HS I have heard. Nice to have the option without feeling shady....

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 4:18 pm
by jdogric12