Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2003 7:29 am
by wileyibex
So if you're through with "vibrant Mable," would you mind if I give her a call?
Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2003 9:29 pm
by 360dave660
ha-ha, sorry about the type-os
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2003 8:46 am
by jerrymac51
My brother Sunsetsam wrote:
"I have a 620/12 with high gains, and I love the sound they produce. So much so, that I now want a 6 string 620 for recording purposes. And possibly as a good rocking rhtym guitar.
Karl"
I've wanted a Rick 12 for 35 years, and finally I broke down last month and bought a 620/12 MG on eBay. It has so much more tonal range than I expected. It's just like you said, I had to get a 6 string to go along with it. Mr. UPS delivered my 620/6 FG yesterday, and now my 12 is my 2nd favorite guitar. DO IT - you won't be sorry.
jerrymac
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2003 5:40 pm
by wileyibex
JerryMac,
I've had thoughts of picking up a 620/12 for a while now. I want another RIC 12, but I'd prefer to buy one that I don't feel requires me to spend another bagfull of $$$ on to make the neck more playable by having a re-spaced nut cut and installed...
So how do you like the neck on the 620?
Is it 330/360 narrow or 380/660 wide? Good? Bad?
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2003 7:11 pm
by jerrymac51
It's narrow like a 330/360. I have always wanted a Ric 12, but always put it off because of the narrow spacing. I got this one off eBay, the price was OK, it was beautiful and less than a year old. I took the chance, and I'm glad I did. But I have relatively thin fingers, and open chords are still difficult to finger clean. Not so much because I hit extra notes, it's more like some strings get muffled. Mostly my finger on the B-strings interfering with the octave G-string or top E-string. I don't seem to have any problem with the lower strings.
Having said all that, if you felt it necessary to do the nut conversion on a 330/360, my guess is that you would need to do it on the 620 as well.
jerrymac