Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:35 am
Tony, thanks for the response to my question. The V64 and '97 are favorites of mine. I can understand why you play the 12-string more than the 6-string. I think this is a good testament to those that think the 12-string is a one-trick-pony. Especially with the 3-piece band, it adds a lot of depth and helps fatten the sound up tremendously - and your playing leads on it! I am interested to know if in fact you add some overdrive from time-to-time?
I can relate to Kent's question about a 4th player. How do you think an acoustic rhythm would sound? It's interesting to me that your band is a 3-piece, Bob mentioned playing in a lot of 3-piece bands and I am now in a 3-piece British Invasion band. I like the 3 pieces but we have decide to try to find a 4th player that would play a lot of acoustic (some electric) to round out the sound. Much like the Beatles (mostly early to mid) sound with Lennon playing a ton of J160E. That sound is magical, IMO. Because we do all covers (40% Beatles), that sound is in my head. It sounds like you do a lot, if not all, originals, and that might make a difference. Plus, I get the feeling that you use your effects, effectively, to minimize the drop-off. I have experienced a lot less drop-off in our latest performances and I do use compression and occasional overdrive and chorus. I might try the delay again. So, the whole 3-piece thing really is quite interesting.
Tony, you indicated a concern of not getting the sound to muddied-up, so to speak, with another guitar, and I can relate to that. If the 3-piece is really cooking it can be "pure and simple" and uncomplicated to the point that it sounds quite good live. Recording however might be a completely different story.
Another thing, you have inspired me to try a Marshall (tube amp). I am curious. I use an AC30TBX and I like it but I am going to take my 12-string to the music store and try it with a good Marshall. I will admit, I am partial to Vox and open backs. I will let you know how it goes.
I can relate to Kent's question about a 4th player. How do you think an acoustic rhythm would sound? It's interesting to me that your band is a 3-piece, Bob mentioned playing in a lot of 3-piece bands and I am now in a 3-piece British Invasion band. I like the 3 pieces but we have decide to try to find a 4th player that would play a lot of acoustic (some electric) to round out the sound. Much like the Beatles (mostly early to mid) sound with Lennon playing a ton of J160E. That sound is magical, IMO. Because we do all covers (40% Beatles), that sound is in my head. It sounds like you do a lot, if not all, originals, and that might make a difference. Plus, I get the feeling that you use your effects, effectively, to minimize the drop-off. I have experienced a lot less drop-off in our latest performances and I do use compression and occasional overdrive and chorus. I might try the delay again. So, the whole 3-piece thing really is quite interesting.
Tony, you indicated a concern of not getting the sound to muddied-up, so to speak, with another guitar, and I can relate to that. If the 3-piece is really cooking it can be "pure and simple" and uncomplicated to the point that it sounds quite good live. Recording however might be a completely different story.
Another thing, you have inspired me to try a Marshall (tube amp). I am curious. I use an AC30TBX and I like it but I am going to take my 12-string to the music store and try it with a good Marshall. I will admit, I am partial to Vox and open backs. I will let you know how it goes.