"Limited" Production Runs of Instruments.....

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rubrsol97
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 7:04 pm
Contact:

Post by rubrsol97 »

I'm not sure...it would seem though that the mainstream new product strategy leans towards the future and future customer base...who aren't necessarily rooted in the past classics like many of us. This is complete conjecture on my part...IMHO
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

There is one band out there of young guys in the Pop-Top 40 mainstream of airplay (I can't think of their name)---one of the guitar players plays a Combo 400 or 450!!!! How's that for being new and innovative??

RIC (along with everyone else for that matter) has made tons of $$$ off of nostalgia and retro-products...it only seems natural that more of the 'historical' instruments will be produced..Just as it was with the 'Beatle' related stuff, so shall it be with other models too...
User avatar
rkbsound
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1205
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:48 pm
Contact:

Post by rkbsound »

So what is RIC's long range strategy?
fred56
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 3:17 pm

Post by fred56 »

I like Mike's idea -- that's the model I'd go for too. A 360/12 with a wider fingerboard.

From there, the remaining choices are virtually incidental, although I suspect most folks would want:

-- full-width triangular inlays (a la TP, CW, RM models)
-- VP -- vintage pickup option
-- 21 fret neck, not 24 fret neck
-- headstock in trimmer, slimmer '60s style (although this would not be a sticking point for me)
-- choice of finishes (Fireglo, Mapleglo, Jetglo, possible Burgundyglo?)

That's my two cents.

Fred
rubrsol97
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 7:04 pm
Contact:

Post by rubrsol97 »

snip duplicate message
rubrsol97
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 7:04 pm
Contact:

Post by rubrsol97 »

That part was left to the imagination...I've taken the liberty of paraphrasing John's email.

RIC is incredibly busy with the existing production lineup and on expanding pruduction facilities. Given that situation, John indicated that there wasn't room for a 'new' product much less contemplate one. Although if that situation should improve, new models, such as the Byrd C series that I mentioned, 'might' be possible. The only changes that could happen until then will be ones that would improve on the long term strategy.
rick12dr
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 7:51 pm

Post by rick12dr »

People that would want the so -called "C" series
to include a replica of Roger's 1st or 2nd Rick 370-12 are missing one Very important item, that, if missing from the equation, would make the whole rest of the package Null and Void, regardless how good they spec'ed it out.That item?
The infamous Crushed Pearl Inlay. To date None has been found to exist Anywhere.Until then, Dream On.........
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

Yes, it would be great to have crushed-pearl inlay once again, and I understand that John Hall has looked high and low for a supplier--no one is doing it at the moment, and the original stuff from '64- early '73 came from Japan....to make it a 1 to 1 accurate reproduction as the other C-Series instruments are, someone would have to make the inlay.....but in the end, I wonder if I would be that picky. Image But if it could happen the right way, I'm all for it.
User avatar
rkbsound
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1205
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:48 pm
Contact:

Post by rkbsound »

I think John Hall once said that the smaller size triangular inlays were created to stregnthen the neck (more wood/less inlay). Can anyone attest to there being a difference in the old way vs the new way as far as a noticable difference in playability?
fred56
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 3:17 pm

Post by fred56 »

Miguel,

Your idea seems uncannily like that of another guitar-tinkerer: Les Paul. :-)

I agree -- the TP neck & fingerboard onto a 330 - 370 series body would work for me!

Fred
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”