My 4000 being refined
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
It's an HD. It was a 4000. When I bought it, someone had put a Guild pickup in the neck position and had it wired vol/tone/toggle. I got used to that configuration. Now I have it vol/vol and the toggle I call the 'engineer' knob; it's only for show. I put a toaster in it. At one time I had considered Squire-izing it, but now I'm glad that the luthiers refused to do it. The Fireglo definitely 'glows.' It's almost like fire opal. The pics don't do it justice.
I got it 12 years ago at G*tar Center for $400.
I got it 12 years ago at G*tar Center for $400.
"If you think you can or if you think you cannot - either way you are right." Henry Ford.
I'd say that it was probably one of the bodies from the 67 4001S run, that was obviously left in single p/up form. Same Fireglo as Kens 4001S.
Hopefully he'll post a pic for comparison.
You also have the long tapered horseshoe surround from 67 too. Pity the horseshoes are gone. I'd be tempted to find a lap steel and stick some in the original p/up position.
Nice to see Guitar Center actually did something right once!
Lovely bass!
Hopefully he'll post a pic for comparison.
You also have the long tapered horseshoe surround from 67 too. Pity the horseshoes are gone. I'd be tempted to find a lap steel and stick some in the original p/up position.
Nice to see Guitar Center actually did something right once!
Lovely bass!
- headbanger
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2001 10:06 pm
-
ken_swearingen
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2298
- Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm
It had no original routing. The routing was done by whomever put in the Guild. It was definitely made as a 4000.
The FG doesn't have as much of the yellow. It has a little on the front but none on the back. The back looks more like the reissue fireglo's. Also the red spray isn't on the ends of the horns or the middle of the sides.
The bridge pup has the aluminum base so maybe that was a transition year. It sounds better than any Ric I've ever laid hands on (and that's a lot) so I'm in no way inclined to swap it out.
The FG doesn't have as much of the yellow. It has a little on the front but none on the back. The back looks more like the reissue fireglo's. Also the red spray isn't on the ends of the horns or the middle of the sides.
The bridge pup has the aluminum base so maybe that was a transition year. It sounds better than any Ric I've ever laid hands on (and that's a lot) so I'm in no way inclined to swap it out.
"If you think you can or if you think you cannot - either way you are right." Henry Ford.
They are similar when compared side by side Scott. Ken does have a little more yellow round the guard, but the Fireglo shading was done by the same hand for sure.
The 68 Fireglo is different. There are a few here and they look nothing like that shade. A new guy in the booth at that time. I'm pretty certain yours was made/sprayed in 67 and fitted with a 68 jackplate when the order came in.
All basses have the aluminum base until at least 73. Anyone?
The 68 Fireglo is different. There are a few here and they look nothing like that shade. A new guy in the booth at that time. I'm pretty certain yours was made/sprayed in 67 and fitted with a 68 jackplate when the order came in.
All basses have the aluminum base until at least 73. Anyone?
- rickenbrother
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 13222
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am
- headbanger
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2001 10:06 pm

