Page 2 of 3
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:24 am
by tony_carey
What a beautiful colour Mitch...well done. A bargain I'd say. Doesn't look like an autumnglo, but who cares when you have a FG like that one. One of the nicest I've ever seen on a 620.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:32 am
by octagon
Thanks Anthony!I had been browsing Ebay looking at Danelectro 12-strings but I always take a peek at the Ricks to see if there are any bargains and when I saw this one for $699 BIN I just couldn't resist.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:18 am
by octagon
This guitar maybe "Autumnglo" afterall as I just found a 2000 post by Mr Hall in which he answered the Question "What is the Difference between Walnut and Autumnglow":
"The earliest version of Autumnglo was simply shaded brown. The middle
clear areas on most of these old guitars have yellowed, but wasn't
originally apparent. The next version was just Fireglo laid on rather
heavily. The last version was back to that original brown, but in a
satin finish, while the gloss version of that color was designated
Walnut.
So when someone says Autumnglo, you always have to ask "WHICH
Autumnglo"?"
[John Hall,
[email protected], 2/17/2000]
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:27 am
by octagon
Now we just need to find out the time frame for the 2nd Autumnglow finish.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:54 am
by tony_carey
That's interesting Mitch. I have seen a couple of what appears to be FG, but claiming to be autumnglo. That could explain it. It would cause confusion though, because nearly all the '90's FG's are very dark (even towards black at the heaviest areas....I have several). The autumnglo that I know, is like the tobacco burst that Gibson used, or a light montezuma.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:18 am
by jingle_jangle
This is an aged FG, not AG. AG was done with a brownish-burgundy pigment in the shading paint, which does not yield a bright red anything like this one.
It is, however, one of the most gorgeous FGs I've seen!
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:25 am
by tony_carey
I agree with you Paul, but like I said, I have seen ads like this one claiming to be AG & JH's comments, as told by Mitch, are very interesting. Regardless of this particular gtr, there does seem to be a certain ambiguity where AG is concerned.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:34 am
by awoodfellow
Man, that is really nice.
Let me ask though, as I'm researching for my first ( <- positive thoughts) Rickenbacker purchase, how does the sound of this series compare to a 360/12?
thanks,
'brose
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:56 am
by Scastles
I would think this more closely resembles/ or is AG.
.

Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:31 am
by octagon
Yes that is what I would think Autumglo looks like,but it seems,from Mr Halls comments,that the second version of Autumnglo was just Fireglo renamed as Autumnglo.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:45 am
by jingle_jangle
I don't read JH's comments like that. It seems like he was trying to emphasize the ambiguity of describing a color with just a name.
Montezuma Brown used to be a solid s**tbrindle brown back when, too, not a burst.
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:12 am
by melibreits
Whoa, what a cool-looking 325.... I love that 2 o'clock f-hole!
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:18 am
by octagon
Yeah,and the 2 oven knobs!What year is that?
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:44 am
by octagon
By the way,how is the 620 for playing blues and hard rock?
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:36 pm
by bluesyric
Of the 30+ guitars I've owned, the 620 is by far my favorite for blues. I use both pickups on for clean stuff and the bridge pickup for when I dial in a little grit.
About as hard as I get is stuff like Cream, and for that it sounds great as well. I was really amazed at how versatile it is.