4004cii BBR

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

Yeah,,,

Image
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
bottom4
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2063
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 6:24 am

Post by bottom4 »

I almost did what Brian did - twice actually!

By the way Brian - very cool a lot!

But I too couldn't resist The Tranny Red.

Except for those damn gold surrounds

Image
Image

I’m considering putting the gold hardware back on it with the exception of the surrounds and then one fine day switching out the pup's so there are no surrounds like Joey’s 5er

Merry Christmas to all!
or Happy Holidays!
Which ever you prefer!
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

Well, everyone posting their 4004's...

Image

Really don't want to change anything about it. Image
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
User avatar
incubus2432
Senior Member
Posts: 4174
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:26 am

Post by incubus2432 »

BTW....my JG 4004L was $1199 from POTR and MG should be the same (IIRC POTR quoted $1299 for a 4004L BBR.....not a Cii I know.....but still). That seems odd for Bass NW as I've always gotten pretty good deals from them.
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

My FG Laredo was a little more...$1229 with insured shipping. I also got it from POTR. That was in March, before the price increases.
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
johnashfield
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 8:57 pm
Contact:

Post by johnashfield »

I must admit I don't like the look of the neck pickup being right up against the neck. Is the wound very different than with the pup backed off a 1/2 inch?

It's still a beautiful bass, but, well I imagine I'll just get used to it.
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

I believe they moved the pup back up to the neck position to allow easy changing of the truss rods if one were to snap. Simply remove the neck pickup and pull the rods out. That being said, I hope that I never break a rod in my bass, the only way I can see to get to the rods would be to remove the fingerboard. Image
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13222
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Post by rickenbrother »

When I received my mapleglo 4004Cii5, I assumed that RIC used some sort of push pin at the two truss rod access holes at the body end of the neck to get the truss rods out at the headstock side of the neck. I guess to make truss rod removal easier, they moved the position of the pickups.
Image
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

Buy it before someone else does
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

I like that bass alot. I think its Ed Duponts.
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13222
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Post by rickenbrother »

I think you're right Scott. I had been tempted to pull the trigger on that one the last time it was listed, but I don't want another midnight blue bass.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
incubus2432
Senior Member
Posts: 4174
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:26 am

Post by incubus2432 »

I was really tempted to get Ed Dupont's 4004L MID....the pickup spacing was the deal breaker. I much prefer the bass p/u against the neck......that leaves the bridge p/u in about the same place as that of a 4003 which is a comfortable position for me to use as a reference point and occasional thumb rest.
User avatar
edski
Advanced Member
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:27 am

Post by edski »

For such a bassy sounding bass, I think the configuration that I have adds a little treble growl. I'm guess if I ever needed to I could replace the truss rods, they'd just have to come out of the headstock?

AS for the PU positions, I'll have to measure later if I get the chance...but one time I did a rough comparison via some pictures it seemed that the 2004 Laredo was pretty similar to my 75 4001...

I'll report back on that with some real measurements soon.
Above e-mail is inactive. try ed_ardzinski@**** where **** is Hotmail.com or Yahoo.com. I tend to see things inthe hotmail box quicker...
User avatar
atomic_punk
Senior Member
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by atomic_punk »

How many basses has anyone had to pull the rods on? And then think, how many NEW basses have had to had the rods pulled? Maybe 30-40 year old ones, but not a NEW one.
My daughter will be playing it by then, let her worry about it! Image
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

Jeff Rath had a real nice red 4003S-5 that a rod snapped on. It was nearly new.

Its not likely that you'd break a rod, but the possibility is there.
"Knowledge is Power"
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”