Big Oopss, need new truss rod now

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

I was just working on a bass and the neck is so strong that even with a 5th string added the truss rods are only finger tight ...
cheenyc13
New member
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:21 pm
Contact:

Post by cheenyc13 »

Hey i took my ric to this guy at sam ash in queens,ny he did a great job on my neck..
User avatar
charlyg
Senior Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:01 am

Post by charlyg »

But how's the bass? And I didn't know they had Chiros at Sam Ash!
jmh
Member
Posts: 285
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 8:57 pm

Post by jmh »

I took my Ric a year or so ago to a store in Huntington, LI. He also did a good job, although I'm not sure he set the intonation. He said he did, my Bass Podxt's tuner said he didn't. He also suggested I use 45-95 gauge strings, which I did for awhile, but I wanted the feel of a 105 again.
If it ain't broke, break it, then fix it.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Jack: E-mail me - I will make the rod today or tomorrow.
jmh
Member
Posts: 285
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 8:57 pm

Post by jmh »

E-mail sent, thanks.
If it ain't broke, break it, then fix it.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Post by henry5 »

I actually prefer the sound of a lighter E, around 90/95. My 8 string originally had a 90 E and it sounded terrific; when I changed the strings and put a 105 on that it lost all its twang and clang....I currently have 40-95 Rotos on my Ricks, and prefer the sound to the 45-105s, although strangely I possibly prefer the feel of the heavier strings.
"Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."
redvette
New member
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by redvette »

Am I missing something here? I thought that you should always loosen the strings a little before trying to tighten the truss rods. Otherwise you are working against the neck AND the string tension. I generally use the "old" method and apply a little pressure to the back of then neck when tightening (no more than 1/4 turn). Then, I retune and wait a day or so before tightening some more if necessary.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

No, neck adjustments are pointless without the corresponding string load. The instrument should be tuned to pitch. When adding tension to the old style rods or a stubborn neck with the new style rods, the neck should be flexed BACK, away from the string pull. So you would be pressing on the front of the neck (fingerboard). I usually grip the neck at the first fret and pull back slightly as I adjust the nuts. Then I retune and check the neck again.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Jack's bass arrived safely and I have more or less determined the cause of the problem. I've seen this condition on a few Ricks recently. Marc Seligman's FG V63 suffered from it. The ends of the rods at the body are way up inside the end of the neck. So far up that the adjusting nuts at the top ran out of rod thread. Initially I thought it might have been from over-tightening and that the wood compressed but after a close examination of the holes, I don't believe that to be the case. I could be wrong but it looks to me like the holes were drilled too far in during manufacturing. There was no visible distortion or splintering. The rods are nearly 1/2" too far in. Compressing that much maple would have left some tell tale signs. The holes are otherwise perfectly clean. I will post some pics later. Anyway, the plan of attack is to use some drilled out hardwood dowels as spacers to move the end nuts back to about where they should be. I am hoping that the up-bow the neck has developed (presumably from being strung up with inadequate truss support) will eventually be corrected by respacing the rods.
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

That should be very interesting. Looking forward for detailed updates.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Post by chefothefuture »

I remedied a problem like that with steel instead
of wood dowels.
I used rodstock and turned it down to about .002
oversize. Then I bored it to #10.
The rods Rick use are #8- I might try that next time...

I hade a problem in a different Rick where the wood did
collapse due to the compression.
John Hall had mentioned in another thread using
super glue to coat the holes and harden the wood...
'68 4001MG, '70 4001 21Fret, '71 4001S MG, '71 4001FG, '72 4001AZ, '73 4001FG, '73 4001resto, '59 365FG, '96 381/12v69FG, '71 4001 21Fret FG
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

I've gotten inside now and have found some evidence of tearing and compression. It is amazing how smooth and consistent the hole looked at first. I stuck my depth gauge in there to measure the offset. It is kind of an awkward angle. I measured it 3 or 4 times to make sure I was getting a good reading. On the last pass, the tip of the depth gauge knocked a chunk of maple splinters loose. Hmmmm. The hole is about .8" deep. I made my dowel about .3" thick that sets the acorn nut just inside the end of the neck and the tip of the rod to the top end of the adjusting nuts.
User avatar
charlyg
Senior Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:01 am

Post by charlyg »

Sometimes you feel like a nut..........
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

Here is a shot showing the problem at the headstock. The E side rod is clearly f'd up the adjusting nut is right at the bottom of the threads. The G side rod has been respaced and shows a more reasonable and hopefully functional length.

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”