What year & model Ricks have the thinnest necks
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Well the nut could stand to be a bit lower. I remember when I got the frets leveled on my Tele bass the nut was tweaked as well and it played like butter when I got it back. The neck on the 4003 is flat and I lowered the bridge a tad but I get a lot of fret buzz and it's no where as low as the F*nder which does not buzz. I'm afraid of adjusting the truss rods though. She currently has Rick strings on her.
'73 4001 MG '88 4003S JG '89 4003S FG '91 4003S MG
-
jwr2
I have played one 4001c64 ... it was in the 2002 2005 range ... the neck was noticeably slimmer ... still fatter than a 4003 for the same era ... the one 4001cs that I played had a slimmer neck ... I also played a 4003s from about 90-93 range it had a sweet neck ... on the whole the 73-84 4001 basses seem to have a slightly slimmer neck than many 4003 basses ...
I can hopefully compensate for normal neck variations now. Before, it was a losing battle I didn't know how to correct for. I'm guessing the nut and saddle adjustments finally brought the E string back to it's correct height and arc with the neck, as well as going to a lighter gauge and great sounding string. I also have no idea if the bridge pickup was at the correct height.
If it ain't broke, break it, then fix it.
-
jwr2
...and Jared said "A 2004 C64 was the 'slimist' neck I have ever not played."
NOT played?
NOT played?
'73 4001 MG '88 4003S JG '89 4003S FG '91 4003S MG
My basses in order of descending "fatness"...
1997 4001CS
1993 4003
2005 4004LK
1986 4003
1967 4001
My CS definitely has the chunkiest neck. I have not had the opportunity to play the 1967 4001 yet, but I was shocked how thin the neck felt before I shipped it off to Paul W. for him to work his magic. These opinions are based on the scientific term "feel" and have not been verified with measurements!
1997 4001CS
1993 4003
2005 4004LK
1986 4003
1967 4001
My CS definitely has the chunkiest neck. I have not had the opportunity to play the 1967 4001 yet, but I was shocked how thin the neck felt before I shipped it off to Paul W. for him to work his magic. These opinions are based on the scientific term "feel" and have not been verified with measurements!
"not played"
I guy named Jaymi used to give me (goodhearted) cr_p for not regularly playing out my basses. Therefore my playing along with CDs doesn't qualify as "actual" playing.
I think part of the sensation of that C64 neck was the satin finish along the back. Since I used to be a J_zz bass guy, my 4003 neck kinda felt like a Louisville Slugger...
IMHO
I guy named Jaymi used to give me (goodhearted) cr_p for not regularly playing out my basses. Therefore my playing along with CDs doesn't qualify as "actual" playing.
I think part of the sensation of that C64 neck was the satin finish along the back. Since I used to be a J_zz bass guy, my 4003 neck kinda felt like a Louisville Slugger...
IMHO
Buy it before someone else does
-
clankchris
- Member
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 6:43 pm
Yeah....that's another thing....the skinny neck on my 77 is Rock Solid . Truss rods took one adjustment when I bought it and she has'nt changed through 3 different sets of strings ! Too bad it has that horrible binding that caused the purchase of a 4004 Cii . Soon as I finish the the toaster conversion on the Cii I will send the 77 to the bay .
More throttle...Less brakes

I am sure there is a factory standard for setups but there will always be some variation. After the fact, temperature, humidity, and the tendencies of the wood will usually make further adjustments necessary.