Page 2 of 3
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:23 pm
by atomic_punk
Ted, for post 4005, you COULD have posted your 4003S5? Maybe?

Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:25 pm
by rickfan60
I thought about that. There is such a solid 4005 community here that I opted off. To many, there is no substitute for a 4005.
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:35 pm
by hieronymous
No 4008 either, huh? Oh well, those pictures were awesome!
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:40 pm
by rickfan60
No, but a 4003S/8. That is as close as I could get on that one.

Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 7:12 pm
by jnbass
hey Ted...
And if I had started at 7
of 9
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:34 pm
by jmh
Why not just start at number one?

Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:47 pm
by jnbass
engage!

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:29 pm
by rickfan60
I am done unless I become a mandolin player or RIC introduces some other model numbers beyond 4080.
It is heavy and awkward but looks cool as hell. I bought it in the early 90's for $700 and thought I was paying way too much then.
For post number 4080...

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:13 pm
by dswp
Ted in honor of your 4080's post....

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:21 pm
by atomic_punk
Nothing like an instrument appreciating 8X in 10 years, eh, Ted?

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:33 pm
by rickfan60
Way cool Dave! You are definitely the master of double neck Ricks.
Nobody wanted the 4080 back the 70's and 80's now they are prized pieces.
Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 10:28 pm
by leftyguitars
Ted, you could have posted my 4005, because if it wasn't for you I may never have got it!

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:07 am
by 8mileshigh
Hello Pete! I'd recognise that sweatshirt anywhere

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:38 am
by bob_the_bass
Pete ... which store are you in there, or ... is that YOUR collection ??
Bob
Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:02 am
by nattiep
Sorry I'm late, but congrats, Ted!