Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:03 am
by sloop_john_b
Decent action here, could use a bit of a tweak but nothing bad. Comparable to any 4003's i've owned, but I think we've established that by now.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:06 am
by ealdrett
The one Tim S. owns had decent action as well.
However, the other two I've owned would only get high action, which meant neck resetting. Big Time!
Rod adjustments just would not work.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:13 am
by wints
To think of the stress on that 8 string neck! They are so thin to start with, and then the extra tension on the old rod system.
I wonder if the action could ever be "low"...
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:16 am
by tsarter
Ed already spoke for me but, yes, mine has very nice action.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:21 pm
by thx1955
Here's another, in Denmark St it's not even Fireglo, a bargain at a mere
$16842
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:28 pm
by marc61
The bass in the Ebay UK auction was mine. Mike sold it to him for me.
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:31 pm
by sloop_john_b
I remember all the trouble you went through to get it, Marc. Didn't like it?
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:53 pm
by rickfan60
There is some upbow in that neck. Typical of a 4005? I think not. I played a slew of them at the 75th and I played Jeff Scott's in Columbus. Typical for a 4005 is much better than that, in my estimation. The action on Kathleen is quite low too.
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:07 am
by marc61
John, it was the circumstances with the bass. Just gave me a bad vibe and I didn't want to play it.
I will say this, Mike Parks worked very hard and was reasonable. I could not have gotten on Ebay what he netted me on the sale.
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:00 am
by wints
Without doubt, one of the better examples aesthetically speaking...