Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:14 am
by gothbin
I use cubase 2.2 now and used to use Nuendo 1.53 in the past. I also used Pro Tools when I was a student at the SAE college in Amsterdam. All software packeges have there pro's and cons so find out what you really want to achieve, how much you can spent and so on. Nothing comes cheap so think before you buy!!!
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 6:52 pm
by s4001
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:37 am
by johnhall
I've used just about every software package for recording at one time or another; in my mind, there is nothing better on the market at the moment than Cakewalk's Sonar 6. Their V-Vocal and Audio Snap features are worth the price alone.
Nuendo would be a distant second, in my opinion, but are lagging a bit right now in features and user interface. Pro Tools is still a standard but it's so quirky and clunky that it only slows me down. Cubase is, well, just Cubase.
Just a personal opinion though; they all work well and your needs and preferences may be quite different than mine.
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:42 am
by jaybic
Very cool Scott. Thanks
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 7:51 am
by atomic_punk
Cakewalk is the only one I have used, I am a little technology-challenged when it comes to digital recording.
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 6:13 pm
by drathbun
SONAR! I've been using Sonar since it was Cakewalk version 9. It is now in Sonar Producer Edition version 6.01.
Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:56 am
by ginger_lee
All I use is my old Teac 3440 reel to reel 4 tk as a board into line in of my computer into cool edit pro..I'll use Cubase to run Grooveagent(the Steinberg virtual drummer)..I've been running out of the pre amp out of my V-9 into the teac so I have my tube preamp reverb and distortion from the Ampeg