Page 2 of 7
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:04 pm
by rickcrazy
Okay, we have a winner: STEVE!
Hold on, I'll be right here.
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:19 pm
by rickcrazy
Now, just for the fun of it, what exactly gives those parts away as being non-Rick parts?
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:00 pm
by aceonbass
Steve didn't even mention the tailpiece in addition to the bridge, switch knob, pickguard and pickup surround. That's the most obvious part due to the holes where the strings go through.
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:33 pm
by dluxe
The pickguard should not have holes for the finger rest. The bridge was mentioned above. I guess the switch tip should be black? Not certain how you can tell about the rear pickup surround.
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:37 pm
by jps
Not only on the Rick, but the grill cloth is not original to the amp!

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:54 pm
by rickcrazy
Steve referred to the bridge/tailpiece assembly simply as "bridge".
"The pickguard should not have holes for a finger rest". That and both the wrong shape of its "left" shoulder and the incorrectly-sized neck pickup opening give it away as fake.
The oval-shaped tailpiece string holes are a dead giveaway, yes.
Right, the plastic switch cap should be black.
As for the treble pu surround, take a good look at it: on a legit Rick surround, the holding screws on the front (narrow) flange are not as spaced apart as those on the rear (wide) flange. Right, RIC?
Steve, I'll ship the pickup in a few days' time.
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:59 pm
by rickcrazy
P.S. Jeffrey, sorry, but said amp & grill cloth do not qualify as Rickenbacker products...


Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:30 pm
by jps
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:49 pm
by seabass
Jim Glen pointed out the black nut. I think he's right because the '72's and early '73's that I have seen had a white nut. No?
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:28 pm
by thx1955
I got 3 out of 4, so I'm happy !!!
The tailpiece should have still been split and it's not !
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:59 pm
by atomic_punk
Thank you Sergio, your posts and faker-spotting wisdom have taught me well

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:45 pm
by rickcrazy
You're welcome, Steve.
Dave, you may be right about the white nut.
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:04 am
by bob_atherton
Jim, I thought the split tailpiece went out in late '72 ?
Even with all these repro parts it's still a very nice bass IMHO.
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 1:15 am
by markbass99
Most small inlay 73's, checkered or not, had the non-split tailpiece. And for what it's worth, my May 73 with small inlays has a black nut and it appears to be original. My other two earlier 73's have white nuts...

.
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:07 am
by rickcrazy
Obviously, the first 4001 appointments to go out - in April/May 1973 - were the split tailpiece and the full-width fretboard inlays. Later that year, the block binding was discontinued together with the toaster pickup. One thing I'm not sure though is whether the "2nd version" (= "button top") treble high-gain pickup replaced the "1st version" (= "screw top") on the 4001 model prior to the toaster being replaced by a high-gain as well.