"Completely original"

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Post by paologregorio »

I too think it's a fakenbacker.

I thought about trying Dynasonics on a Rick, but I'd never drill holes in any Rickenbacker to do so. I gave up on the idea after A/B-ing my Dynasonic-equipped Gretsch Silverjet and a Hi Gain-equipped 360 WB. Guess what; the hi gain-equipped WB sounded as or more gutsy than my Silverjet, much to my surprise.
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

I think the guitar is legit. If the finish is original, I'd peg it as a late '66 to '67 model. It definitely led a tough life. Maybe it was broken or had a crack in the heel. A total resto would make it nice again.
dale_fortune
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:00 am

Post by dale_fortune »

I agree John..This is a late 60's 330 that has gone thru much abuse and modifications. It would be a great candidate for the work I do in turning this into a 64 360/12WBBS. Just a little FYI: if the bidding doesn't get to rediculous on this, then I will make a bid with the intent of a future 330 to 360/12 WB project that I will sell after complete restoration.
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Post by walker »

When I looked at this add, the seller listed the serial as GF 2845 - so that would equate to 1967. Good luck Dale!



Image
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Post by johnhall »

I think it's genuine, in very poor condition, and that the seller is clueless, though seemingly honest.
User avatar
brammy
Senior Member
Posts: 5074
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 5:00 am

Post by brammy »

I would be great if it were resurrected - and then see the before-and-after shots.

Gee... its at $510 with 8 days to go. Hardly worth it IMHO.
“The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it.” ....H. L. Mencken
dale_fortune
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:00 am

Post by dale_fortune »

Yes I agree and would not bid on it now. Mark I was referring to making a Harrison replica from the 1967 carcass.
dale_fortune
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:00 am

Post by dale_fortune »

dale_fortune
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:00 am

Post by dale_fortune »

If you scroll thru the 96 photos, it will give you and idea what it takes to bring a guitar like this back to life. Daniel bought this body and parts off Ebay for almost $1,000.00. Seems kind of high to me but what he got in the end was worth the effort.
dale_fortune
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:00 am

Post by dale_fortune »

Thank You
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Post by paologregorio »

I think it'd be cool to resto as a 360 OS/6, but then it's one of my favorite models, so I'm looking at it from my own perspective. I'm curious, do most owners who want this work done usually want a 12? Interesting. I would think that some players who paid for this work would want a 6 since the 360C63/12 is available, while there are no 360 OS/6 strings currently available new, but since Dale and Paul have the pulse for those who want this type of resto work done, I'm sure you gentlemen are in the know.

Of course, for lovers of the 21 fret Ricky/6 there is the model 381/6, which I'm starting to like even more than my WBs :o)
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

Ring me up if you get tired of that Azureglo, Paul! Image
dale_fortune
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:00 am

Post by dale_fortune »

I have 3 in the shop at this moment: 2 will be 12 strings and 1 will be a 6 string. When they start out as a 12 string, it's best to complete it as a 12 string, it's a slotted peghead issue. Turning a 12er into a 6 is obvious, but turning a 6 into a 12 isn't, plus I like to keep the original markings in the control cavity noting what it's origin was. This is an example of probably what happened to this 330 some years ago..The neck broke at the heel, it was glued back together and an amatuer red finish was applied with the heel being totally covered to hide the break, making the walnut strip seem to stop at the heel.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Post by paologregorio »

JB: Man I sold that one once already, regretted it, and was lucky to be able to buy it back. It's the first Ricky guitar I ever bought, so I probably won't make that mistake again. Image

Oops, Dale. Sorry, I was confused between the beater 330/6 in the original photo and the McNabb conversion that you completed. I thought that you wanted to convert this 330/6 that's on Ebay into a 360/12 WBBS, when you were actually referring to the McNabb conversion that was originally a 12, along with saying that beater 330/6 on Ebay was a good candidate for a conversion, though not necessarily to a 12.
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
dale_fortune
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:00 am

Post by dale_fortune »

Here is a picture of a 360WB that fell off the guitar stand, I could assume that the 330 suffered the same kind of fate but had a not so good repair done.
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b53/DaleFortune/Rick3.jpg
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”