Re: All in the (Pascoe) family!
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 12:20 am
Speaking of Pie, a major bakery/bread maker here in Japan is called Pasco. no 'e'
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
Joey, I believe that was standard practice to offer to "Americanize" names. When my Mon's dad came in, they offered to change his last Croation surname to Shoemaker - they told him that was the translation. He did not, and I am happy for that. But many did.rickenbrother wrote:Jeffy T, I know many Italian-American people that had their name altered or even would up changed to another name that does not at all sound Italian. I think it happened to some other Europeans also when they got to Ellis Island. Luckily all the Italian names in my family made it though without getting changed.
Yeah, we can see that from you avatar!shinynewtoy wrote:(Doesn't help that I'm the most pale Italian on the planet....)
Bob , after seeing pics of you, I never would have thought Italian, Jeffy T on the other hand definitely looks it, no surprise there.shinynewtoy wrote:Doesn't help that I'm the most pale Italian on the planet....
Guess I am kinda pasty too....jps wrote:Yeah, we can see that from you avatar!shinynewtoy wrote:(Doesn't help that I'm the most pale Italian on the planet....)
I always get the card that says "Do not Pascoe, do not collect $200,....."ben_brown wrote:Don't forget guys...to get the $200 you have to Pascoe
You are right, I do look a little paler than normal there...jps wrote:Yeah, you can see it in your face in this photo.
So was it my dark, scruffy, fuzzy face or my rather... "prominent" nose that tipped you off Joey?!rickenbrother wrote: Bob , after seeing pics of you, I never would have thought Italian, Jeffy T on the other hand definitely looks it, no surprise there.
Yes, the reason for the slow shutter speed is to retain enough ambient light so backgrounds do not go dark. This balancing act does have it potential artifacts, however, a worthwhile tradeoff for the most part.elysrand wrote:Looks like you were using a slow shutter speed too
Cool! And you don't use a faster ASA film, or push developing on the film, because we would all be too grainy or low-contrasty?jps wrote:Yes, the reason for the slow shutter speed is to retain enough ambient light so backgrounds do not go dark. This balancing act does have it potential artifacts, however, a worthwhile tradeoff for the most part.elysrand wrote:Looks like you were using a slow shutter speed too