Page 2 of 2
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:23 am
by stevebasshead
Hi Javier,
I've got one of Sergio's specials for my horseshoe (and very good it is too) and he built it with polepieces that are flush to the bobbin rather than the button types RIC use. This gives me even more clearance, so if you do decide to go for a Sergio-built replacement that would certainly help your problem.
Reading through the forums a while back I remember seeing posts from people who had bent their shoes outwards which gives more clearance. Certainly some horseshoes seem to be entirely parallel whereas some (yours included judging by the photo) are opened out somewhat. There may be scope for a little more opening up of yours but obviously with a degree of caution
Also, another easy option for regaussing the shoes is my posting here in the "Winding up with the Best" forum called "Remagnetising Horseshoes"
http://www.rickresource.com/phpBB3/view ... 3&t=347319
Hope this helps.
Steve.
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:36 am
by jps
pflash4001 wrote:On the other issue...is there anything that can be done to increase the gap so the strings don't rattle?
Only on the reissue horseshoes, not the original shoes.
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:46 am
by rickcrazy
Hi again, Javier. No point in sending me the original '68 pickups for a "soup-up job", really. Building a new set from scratch is a much better option, believe me. Which reminds me, didn't I send you a toaster pickup of my own for installing on one of your 4001 basses not many years ago?
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 1:36 pm
by pflash4001
Yes, you did. It lives in my 1979 and is very, very happy there. I have a hard time believing that such a good intrument would have an issue like the pickup rattle thing with no resolution. I just don't want to do anything to screw up this original pickup.
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 1:47 pm
by ben_brown
stevebasshead wrote:...Reading through the forums a while back I remember seeing posts from people who had bent their shoes outwards which gives more clearance. Certainly some horseshoes seem to be entirely parallel whereas some (yours included judging by the photo) are opened out somewhat. There may be scope for a little more opening up of yours but obviously with a degree of caution
Orignal HorseShoe pickups shouldn't need to be bent open as they already are bent to match the crown of the neck. The only ones you would want to bend open are the reissue HorseShoes as
they are the parallel ones. In the thread you speak of the reason for bending was so they would resemble an original HorseShoe.

Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:14 pm
by rickaddict
And from what I understand, the original horsies are made of a much more brittle metal. The RI horsies will bend, but the original horsies are likely to break if you try to bend them.
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:29 pm
by wints
The originals are brittle as JH mentioned a long time ago.
The aesthetic only RI HS is a completely different prospect and can be manhandled accordingly.
"Original Horseshoe pickups shouldn't need to be bent open as they already are bent to match the crown of the neck"...
Look closer at my first post there Ben, and you'll see that is not always the case. My radius would be very twisted if following that pair of shoes!
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:40 pm
by stevebasshead
ben_brown wrote:stevebasshead wrote:...Reading through the forums a while back I remember seeing posts from people who had bent their shoes outwards which gives more clearance. Certainly some horseshoes seem to be entirely parallel whereas some (yours included judging by the photo) are opened out somewhat. There may be scope for a little more opening up of yours but obviously with a degree of caution
Orignal HorseShoe pickups shouldn't need to be bent open as they already are bent to match the crown of the neck. The only ones you would want to bend open are the reissue HorseShoes as
they are the parallel ones. In the thread you speak of the reason for bending was so they would resemble an original HorseShoe.

In that case, best play safe rather than sorry and leave well alone. That said, in my nerdier moments

I've paused DVD closeups of Chris's RM1999 and his shoes really do seem to be completely flattened, maybe just from years of living under Chris's mits...
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:26 pm
by jwr2
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:45 pm
by Yay-cob
What is the actual point of the horseshoe pickups? I dont get what the (i guess you'd say shoes) are for.
I just remember saying I didn't want one because I play over the bridge about 90% of the time while playing my ric. Having something there to play around just seemed like a bad idea
Oh btw, Its sabbath of bass. Couldn't remember the old SN/PW.
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:53 pm
by jps
ben_brown wrote:...the reason for bending was so they would resemble an original HorseShoe.

That was only part of the reason I bent mine, the other being to give more room for adjusting the pickup downward as they are really hot compared to toasters.
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:26 pm
by soundmasterg
What is the actual point of the horseshoe pickups? I dont get what the (i guess you'd say shoes) are for.
The horseshoes make that particular pickup function. The shoes are magnetized, and the strings go inside the magnetic field, and when they move, they disturb the magnetic field and cause an AC current which gets sent out to your amp. I don't have it handy right now, but you could look up the patent number for that pickup originally and study the patent notes to see how it works if you're really curious.
Greg
Re: Weak pickups
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:08 pm
by jps
soundmasterg wrote:...I don't have it handy right now, but you could look up the patent number for that pickup ...Greg
#2,089,171