Missed that earlier, Paul ... it would be some sort of permutation calculation, but I'm a chemist, not a statistician, so I'd have to look it up in a math or statistics text.Anyone have the formula for calculating this? (Doctor Who?)
325 sound question
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: 325 sound question
Almost looks over-engineered to me ... but if it works, why not?
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
-
jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: 325 sound question
I do remember it as simple from statistics...it was somethig like axbxcxd-1...but I'm stumped.
The Les Paul thing is not really over-engineered; as a matter of fact, by simply using that cross-wired 4 gang, 10 position switch, all kinds of options open up. Maybe it looks overdone because it's old, analogue tech...
The Les Paul thing is not really over-engineered; as a matter of fact, by simply using that cross-wired 4 gang, 10 position switch, all kinds of options open up. Maybe it looks overdone because it's old, analogue tech...
Re: 325 sound question
really it is not overdone, lp pro or recording are some of the best from that line of les pauls of 70's. people are scared just beacuse it seems not simplistic enough but it is easy to use even during life performance. if i remeber correctly i've seen couple years ago 450/12 on ebay with similar layout with 3 pickups minus low impedance of course. gibson had the blueshawk line untill very recently that would be probably good to look atfor simple schematics - three way - volume - tone/pull-bypass - varitone.
dusan palka who is also known as grazioso on infamous auction web site
if you want to reach the man and expect an answer please make sure you remove this email address ([email protected]) from your spam block if you have one.
if you want to reach the man and expect an answer please make sure you remove this email address ([email protected]) from your spam block if you have one.