330 Lightshow

Exceptional restoration is in the details

Moderator: jingle_jangle

User avatar
kenposurf
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3001
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 11:50 am
Contact:

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by kenposurf »

I have seen one ...and it is good :shock:
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by paologregorio »

I'm imagining a 330 LS on a guitar with a white finish.

Having a TRC that matches the guards is a nice touch Paul!
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by jingle_jangle »

squid wrote:Is it true that certain lights only ignite if certain frequencies are played? I've got the impression that blue lights flash for bass, yellow for mid, and red for treble, but I don't know if that's real or just some myth I've picked up somewhere.
John, if you watch the video above, you'll see that it's exactly the case.

Paul, that TRC idea was Kenny's (and possibly JH's) as that's how he has his original LS tricked out.

George, you saw it before I had the sensitivity control installed. Now, it's possible to really dial it in!
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by doctorwho »

Paul, what's the resistance value of the sensitivity potentiometer?

Another thing I noticed was that the "light panels" aren't very "thick" ... could a solidbody like a 620 be routed shallow to accommodate the lights without compromising structural integrity? (Yes, I know a wiring channel or tunnel would be needed between top and bottom routs.)
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by jingle_jangle »

Gary, it's 1 megohm, audio taper. The sensitivity pot on an original 331LS is 25Kohm, audio taper. But it works differently.

I don't know what you mean by "panels aren't very thick". They are the same thickness as an original LS, .125" acrylic with the swirly lens adding another .025" to the thickness. They go on on top of the body, as do those on an original. The limiting factor in the whole shebang is the thickness of the stuffed circuit board, which won't clear the pot bottoms on a solid body Rick--it's a smidge too thin. But I'm working on a solution to this.
User avatar
arbiter
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 4:06 pm

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by arbiter »

That is really sweet!!
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by doctorwho »

jingle_jangle wrote:Gary, it's 1 megohm, audio taper. The sensitivity pot on an original 331LS is 25Kohm, audio taper ...
Is the value the same for both the Type I and Type II LS circuits? The one on my Type I is only 4.6 kOhm, so I'm thinking that it's a replacement.
jingle_jangle wrote:... I don't know what you mean by "panels aren't very thick" ...

I meant that with the lights attached to the plastic (instead of being mounted on separate circuit boards on the body), they take up less room than the LS original configuration (panels + circuit board) does.
jingle_jangle wrote:... the stuffed circuit board, which won't clear the pot bottoms on a solid body Rick--it's a smidge too thin. But I'm working on a solution to this ...
Could the circuit board be located under the upper-horn panel where there would be no pots interfering?
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by jingle_jangle »

doctorwho wrote:
jingle_jangle wrote:Gary, it's 1 megohm, audio taper. The sensitivity pot on an original 331LS is 25Kohm, audio taper ...
Is the value the same for both the Type I and Type II LS circuits? The one on my Type I is only 4.6 kOhm, so I'm thinking that it's a replacement.
jingle_jangle wrote:... I don't know what you mean by "panels aren't very thick" ...

I meant that with the lights attached to the plastic (instead of being mounted on separate circuit boards on the body), they take up less room than the LS original configuration (panels + circuit board) does.
jingle_jangle wrote:... the stuffed circuit board, which won't clear the pot bottoms on a solid body Rick--it's a smidge too thin. But I'm working on a solution to this ...
Could the circuit board be located under the upper-horn panel where there would be no pots interfering?
I'll re-check the values on BOTH the Type 2s I have in right now...one could be a replacement. But the circuits on the two Types do differ.

The issue with lamps clearing the underside of the plastic is different with my SS than it is with an original. At least on a Type 2, the bulbs sit high on PC board sockets which themselves waste almost 1/4" of space under each bulb. Add the height of the original, lozenge-shaped bulb, and you're nearly touching the plastic Rowlux. The circuit boards on the Type 2 are 2mm thick glass fiber, screwed to the back of the guitar body.

With my SS version, the 5mm hi-intensity LEDs are only 6mm high, added to the 3mm thick mirrored acrylic backing. Total about .375" high. The circuit boards, stuffed, are about 12mm tall, plus 1.5mm for the board and .5 mm for solder clearance on the back. On a 330 there is about 1" clear space inside the guitar to the underside of the Rowlux. There's not a clearance problem except at the board. I have a much more elegant solution devised for the board clearance problem. With this solution, I can now place LEDs around the pots to eliminate the dead spot in the prototype guitar (seen in my avatar and video).
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by doctorwho »

Thanks, Paul!
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by godber »

Any chance of getting a bulb or two under that custom TRC???
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by jingle_jangle »

Working on it.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by sloop_john_b »

jingle_jangle wrote:Working on it.
No f'ing way. :shock:
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by jingle_jangle »

OK, I'm not working on it.

Phew! That's a load off... :wink:

I'd do a light-up fret board except for two things...

1. I'd have to get rid of all that beautiful and unique varnished wood.

2. It's bad taste... :mrgreen:

Now, if Doctor No would just get on the stick and invent light-up wood...
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by paologregorio »

jingle_jangle wrote:OK, I'm not working on it.

Phew! That's a load off... :wink:
Obviously it would require some wiring leads being fished through the TR tunnel, and possible some slight hollowing out of the headstock under the TRC(but not to the extent that the headstock is weakened, of course) to make room for the LEDs under the TRC. How one would effectively execute this is another matter entirely!
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 330 Lightshow

Post by johnallg »

Figure out how to use the voltage-activated glowing sheet plastic behind the sparklie inlays.... :twisted:
Post Reply

Return to “Reflections of a Curmudgeon: by Paul Wilczynski”