Page 2 of 4

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:26 pm
by beefandbones
310 MG
f-hole
trapeze, toasters, black knobs
otherwise modern hardware (tuners, white guards and trc)
Rick-o-sound

maybe a birdseye maple top
maybe a slightly tan-ish vintage tint rather than an yellowy amber tint

Oh, maaaan I'd love to have one of these!

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:03 pm
by fatcat
Image

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:10 pm
by blueflamerick
This:
Image

or a white neck-through 2030 with black hardware.

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:36 pm
by jimk
I'll steal a photo from jingle_jangle. I'd love to own a copy of this guitar.

JimK

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:49 pm
by rkbsound
White on white. If double bound, then white binding. And bind the freakin' headstock while yer at it. Pure white. Chrome, too. C'mon, RIC!!!

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:06 pm
by grazioso
360/12 with 660 neck. simple enough they could even do it but they won't. oh well someone else will . :twisted:

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:16 pm
by kiramdear
Aw, you guys are awesome! I've never seen so many beautiful guitars on one page together! :P
As for the specs on my own modest offering: Pretty much a "Modern Era" 320, love the thin and narrow neck, ultra short scale and those hi-gains (what a little screamer!) with the addition of "Shadow bass" demi-binding around the front edge and a wiring mod for more switching combinations.
Little sister to the S. Hoag signature model, maybe, but I think the binding is too much on the Hoag. It reminds me of those terrible thinline tele's from the seventies, like Chrissie Hynde played :lol: I prefer something more subtle.
Ah, if I was only famous! :)

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:22 am
by cmuk
collin wrote:
cmuk wrote: I'm fairly sure I used to own this guitar, and MWP before me. I recognise the chip above the tailpiece.

Though I had an Ac'cent installed on it.
Yup, it's MWP's old Ric, very cool to know someone on the board owned it!

Brilliant guitar, the best of all my favorite features ;)

How long ago did you own/sell it?

Cheers,
-Collin
Hi Collin, it was about three years ago. I had it for a year or two.

It had MWP's custom arm for the vibrato which was much longer than a standard Ac'cent one and it was threaded so it screwed straight into it.

Lovely guitar to look at, but the middle pickup just got it the way for me.

I have some other pictures but have no idea how to post them here.

I sold it on and believe it is now back in the USA somewhere.

Clive

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:40 am
by paologregorio
cmuk wrote:
collin wrote:
cmuk wrote: I'm fairly sure I used to own this guitar, and MWP before me. I recognise the chip above the tailpiece.

Though I had an Ac'cent installed on it.
Yup, it's MWP's old Ric, very cool to know someone on the board owned it!

Brilliant guitar, the best of all my favorite features ;)

How long ago did you own/sell it?

Cheers,
-Collin
Hi Collin, it was about three years ago. I had it for a year or two.

It had MWP's custom arm for the vibrato which was much longer than a standard Ac'cent one and it was threaded so it screwed straight into it.

Lovely guitar to look at, but the middle pickup just got it the way for me.

I have some other pictures but have no idea how to post them here.

I sold it on and believe it is now back in the USA somewhere.

Clive
I should probably know this by now, but what is the model number of that guitar, Collin? I thought all of the RM double bound models had dot inlays rather than triangle inlays. :?

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:59 am
by deaconblues
If sold in the USA it would be a 370S, no?

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 1:14 am
by kiramdear
blueflamerick wrote:This:
Image

or a white neck-through 2030 with black hardware.
Definitely the most original finish here today, kind of like Macca's SPLHCB-MMT period version could have been if he'd have lain off the sugar cubes :lol:

:roll: hope I said that right. I mean I like it!

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:08 am
by cmuk
paologregorio wrote:
I should probably know this by now, but what is the model number of that guitar, Collin? I thought all of the RM double bound models had dot inlays rather than triangle inlays. :?
It was a one-off made for Marty Willson-Piper. Not sure if it every had a model number as such.

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:30 am
by collin
paologregorio wrote: I should probably know this by now, but what is the model number of that guitar, Collin? I thought all of the RM double bound models had dot inlays rather than triangle inlays. :?
Well, the general consensus last time was that yes, it's a one off MWP custom, but if it had a model number- maybe 370v64 w/f-hole ?

Cheers,
-Collin

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:26 am
by cmuk
Here's a photo from when I owned the MWP Rickenbacker. Note the elongated Ac'cent handle as I mentioned previously.

Re: what would your own signature model look like?

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:29 am
by scotty
nice bunch there Clive.I love the 381 in JG more so that the FG only in the 381 model tho.i prefer FG in the other models :D