The Sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss 4001 vs 4003

[VRICKY63]

They are sweet basses for sure Rick. The one Ian mentioned that I'm selling on E-bay is set with no reserve. In this economy you may not have to steal too much money to score it!

- Tim

Yeah and maybe I could save on shipping since you are about 1.5 hours from Martinez . Must find $$$.

[tsarter]

Would be no problem to meet up in the East Bay or SF. Always nice to meet folks face to face!

- Tim

[shamustwin]

What year is that, Tim?
Thin neck on it?

[ben_brown]

It's an 89 Jerry. If it's like my 89 4003S the neck is very thin!

[tsarter]

Yup, the neck is thin. Just about the same as my '87. I should double check on the year though - may actually be a '90.

- Tim

[gearhed289]

All three of my Rics are S type. I love em! Binding and triangles look cool, but the binding is annoying. My '89 4 string has a very comfy neck. The '93 8 string is great as well. And the '92 CS is in a class of its own! Feels like a toothpick around the 12th fret.

[johnallg]

My '91 S is my go to bass right now. Since I put in the '73 neck higain and the Sergio's magnetic shoe horsey, it is very hard to put down. I never bonded with this bass and was considering moving it, then had an opportunity to put a magnet shoe'd pickup on and am really glad I did. Wonderful neck, , body, feel, and tone.

[tsarter]

I just double checked the SN. It is a '91.

[VRICKY63]

No S for me . I cant sell enough stuff fast enough . Someday .