Re: The C-Series: Beatle Guitars Only?
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:47 pm
It's just that I rarely get a good idea so I need to plug it as hard as I can. It could be a while before another idea comes along.
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
My godlike 360V64.jdogric12aolcom wrote:360/12v64 guitars are always god all-around instruments. I've often played original music on one.
Not really, because back in the day, if you asked for something special, like sound hole or headstock binding, you could get it!jps wrote:But then, that would not be accurate any more!paologregorio wrote:If they do, I would hope that the option of having soundhole binding is offered; it would make the guitar look even better; the unbound soundhole of the OS models makes it look unfinished or naked in contrast to the other surfaces of the guitar that are bound, and soundhole binding really accents/highlights the soundhole shape.chucksimms wrote:Some great choices to add. I'd suggest a 360/365 OS as well. If they were really accurate to '60s guitars that'd be sweet!
A limited edition is not equivalent to a reissue. And the Japanese reissues might as well not even count. Basically the choice one has is between a ridiculously flamey CW or a ridiculously expensive thick-topped RM. If you can find one.paologregorio wrote:
I am surprised guys would like to see a round front 360/370 RI that badly; I never thought it was that exciting of a model to begin with, and there have already been two reissues of that type, plus the overruns, and the Japan only market RI. then again, I'm biased; if it isn't double bound, I probably wouldn't buy it!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()