Re: 330 spacing?
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 3:02 pm
Man, Jeff, that is one sublime-lookin' Ricky. Bet it plays even better, too. Peace, out.....Goofyfootjps wrote:Whad 'ya mean? I gots 21 frets.dpowell wrote:RIP, 21-fretters.
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
Man, Jeff, that is one sublime-lookin' Ricky. Bet it plays even better, too. Peace, out.....Goofyfootjps wrote:Whad 'ya mean? I gots 21 frets.dpowell wrote:RIP, 21-fretters.
I don't know why, but I'm diggin' that metallic red... I'm a little confused, though... Is that a refin? custom? What year is that? It looks like it's got the new/old slimmed-down headstock.mikethemod1992 wrote:Ummmm, im a tad bit confused. Ive seen some videos of the Jam where paul weller's rickenbackers have pickups near the crowns, rather than lower into the body. And the necks end near the top of the body, rather than into it. any information?
![]()
Looks like a late 80's Ruby 330.That is most definitely not the slim headstock.Mossman wrote: I don't know why, but I'm diggin' that metallic red... I'm a little confused, though... Is that a refin? custom? What year is that? It looks like it's got the new/old slimmed-down headstock.
Thanks Scotty!I put those in my collection.Was his a 1974?scotty wrote:A couple more pics for ya Mitch of wellers old plank!
Thanks Mark! Anybody have nice picks of his Mapleglo.Scotty posted some before but I didn't copy them at the time.godber wrote:Care for another sir....
+1. If Rickenbacker started producing 21-fret standard models again, I would immediately buy one. The 24s have nothing on the 21s aesthetically, and functionally I never use the extra three frets. Might be nice on a Les Paul, but not worth the "big-forehead" compromise on a Rick.beefandbones wrote:Smaller headstock, full width inlays... I hope the next stop is 21 frets!