Re: Restore or leave as is?
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 6:35 pm
I wonder if Weller still has this he must i think Peacock suit was its last outing not unless GG bought it for Easter. 
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
Yes, I like guys too!!jps wrote:How about guys?Rickygirl wrote:...I like battered guitars with a "now looked after" smug expression.
Battered with that "now looked after" smug expression? Or do you prefer them basted?Rickygirl wrote:Yes, I like guys too!!jps wrote:How about guys?Rickygirl wrote:...I like battered guitars with a "now looked after" smug expression.
Battered and deep fried, they're deliciousjps wrote:Battered with that "now looked after" smug expression? Or do you prefer them basted?Rickygirl wrote:Yes, I like guys too!!jps wrote:How about guys?
Yes, its great to see a beautiful, perfect condition Ric, but as a player/weekend warrior, I don't mind seeing wear on an instrument, even to the point of "shabby". To me, its more important it plays and sounds good. Worn guitars can have a definite personailty and can give them that rock and roll or bluesy flair. Heck, some people are paying top dollar for fake-worn new guitars. You've got the real deal!lewie2792 wrote:While it appears that it is not a candidate for restoration from an economic standpoint, it is a crime to leave any Ric in a somewhat shabby condition IMHO.
jps wrote:Rickygirl wrote:Rickygirl wrote:...I like battered guitars with a "now looked after" smug expression.
Battered with that "now looked after" smug expression? Or do you prefer them basted?