Page 2 of 3
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:07 am
by aceonbass
I'm pretty sure RIC's strings were made by D'Addario in the past, while new basses are being shipped with what looks like D'Addario EXL170's. I like these strings for everything. I would tend to think that going to a lighter string would be the wrong direction to go in for funk, particularly if you don't want clank.
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:17 am
by cassius987
aceonbass wrote:I'm pretty sure RIC's strings were made by D'Addario in the past, while new basses are being shipped with what looks like D'Addario EXL170's. I like these strings for everything. I would tend to think that going to a lighter string would be the wrong direction to go in for funk, particularly if you don't want clank.
Exactly! Bigger strings don't clank as much because of the extra tension, compared to smaller strings of the same construction. I also think the extra tension gives you more room to be subtle... with super-light strings I found myself always over-muscling them. They're too delicate for me.
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:15 am
by jps
cassius987 wrote:aceonbass wrote:I'm pretty sure RIC's strings were made by D'Addario in the past, while new basses are being shipped with what looks like D'Addario EXL170's. I like these strings for everything. I would tend to think that going to a lighter string would be the wrong direction to go in for funk, particularly if you don't want clank.
Exactly! Bigger strings don't clank as much because of the extra tension, compared to smaller strings of the same construction. I also think the extra tension gives you more room to be subtle... with super-light strings I found myself always over-muscling them. They're too delicate for me.
Larger gauge strings don't 'clank' as much because they have less of the overtone series available. As to muscling, it is just a matter of retraining yourself to appreciate what a lower tension set of strings can offer, for example, greater subtly, IMHO.

Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:41 am
by rickenbrother
cassius987 wrote:Ironic, I have actually switched to 45-65-85-105 D'A ProSteels recently
I've been using the D'Addario Pro Steels ever since they've been available. Right now, I have them on my '73 4001 and '81 4001S. Though I use the EPS-170 set .100 - .45 which makes less work to re-setup if I want to switch to the D'Addario nickel EXL-170 set.
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:45 pm
by johnallg
jps wrote:As to muscling, it is just a matter of retraining yourself to appreciate what a lower tension set of strings can offer, for example,
greater subtly, IMHO.

I hear ya, Jeff.

Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:52 pm
by cassius987
Thanks for the advice guys... but I'm actually really happy with the sound now.
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:10 am
by paul_yan
How about these 45-65-85-105 "Bootzillas" signature strings from the funk master himself for your Inner Planetary Funkmanship? They are stainless steel strings that chew up your frets faster than nickel-wounds though.

Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:23 pm
by jnbass
Does this guy count?

- Give it to me...
- rick james.JPG (7.96 KiB) Viewed 1083 times
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:38 pm
by faceman
What actually surprises me is that Rick James rarely seemed to play bass live and relied on his band instead. His bassist usually has a StringRay of sorts. He was such a cool artist and I love his music.
In a slight detour off topic, I was watching The A-Team episode that stars Rick James and Isaac Hayes, think it's from Season 4. My thoughts are - Rick isn't playing the bass lines because he's just slapping strings randomly, plus he is dancing when he is supposed to be singing. It's rather a cheap episode but Issac Hayes is just so cool. Another hero gone.
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:03 pm
by legato
That looks like SRV in bizarro world.
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:35 pm
by rickcrazy
Try "Spaceball" (Arista, 1976) by Larry Young's Fuel for some great funky bass lines Rickenbacker-style.
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:59 pm
by cassius987
So what about another kind of funk? Check out "chameleon2" at this page:
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default ... dID=816857
You'll notice my "melody" part has a lot of extra noise, and if any of you have any advice about clearing it or EQing it better (I find it kind of hard to do most melody lines on a fretless with flats and get the right tone), let me know. Or I'll just dub over it with my 4003 with rounds.
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:33 am
by 86kubicki
Very tasty Joshua! What effect is on the "bass" line?
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:38 pm
by cassius987
That is a phaser built in to GarageBand 5, set on medium intensity.
Re: Rickenbacker for Funk? Strings?
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:42 pm
by cjj
Very nice! I love the sound of the fretless - I've gotta get me one of those...