Two JangleBox'es in series ?

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
whojamfan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2552
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:50 am
Contact:

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by whojamfan »

teb wrote:I heard that Steve Lasko developed a very early aptitude for electronics and invented the JangleBox at when he was only three - while all the other kids in his age group were still playing with LEGO. Unfortunately, he had to wait five more years until he was big enough to hold a twelve-string to try it out. :mrgreen:
:shock: :lol: love it!
User avatar
janglebox
Member
Posts: 405
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 2:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by janglebox »

teb wrote:I heard that Steve Lasko developed a very early aptitude for electronics and invented the JangleBox at when he was only three - while all the other kids in his age group were still playing with LEGO. Unfortunately, he had to wait five more years until he was big enough to hold a twelve-string to try it out. :mrgreen:
All TRUE! How did you find out?! :wink:
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by cjj »

It's all in the Ken Burns documentary they showed on PBS...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
Janglyman
Junior Member
Posts: 186
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by Janglyman »

I tried 2 compressors last night. I used a Jbox and a Boss CE2. Test guitars were a 66 450-12 with toasters and an 88 360-12 with hi-gains. Amp was a HiWatt. Running both compressors did not make the sound much better. The Boss was better with the hi-gains, making them chimey. The Jbox sounded better with the toasters. The bright switch made the bridge pickup sound very thin. On bright, the neck pick up was noticeably brighter. This wasn't true of the hi-gains. I noticed that the Jbox sounded very dark or muffled (like your tone knob all the way off) when using the normal or dark settings. Has anyone else noticed this or are my ears just that bad?
User avatar
fatcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1198
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 5:00 am

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by fatcat »

I tried my 370-12 RM wet thru the Jbox, once and found no reason to do it again.
But run dry into the Jbox was a bit better sounding than the on board one, volume control being the best improvement.
Then I can switch uncompressed-to-compressed without a volume change;can't do that w/the onboarder.
The Jbox really shines with the 660-12.
User avatar
teb
Advanced Member
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:39 pm

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by teb »

I just stuck a sound sample in the Rick Recordings section of some experiments with two compressors.
User avatar
beatlefreak
Senior Member
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
Contact:

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by beatlefreak »

janglebox wrote:
teb wrote:I heard that Steve Lasko developed a very early aptitude for electronics and invented the JangleBox at when he was only three - while all the other kids in his age group were still playing with LEGO. Unfortunately, he had to wait five more years until he was big enough to hold a twelve-string to try it out. :mrgreen:
All TRUE! How did you find out?! :wink:
He was one of those kids playing with legos...
Ka is a wheel.
User avatar
teb
Advanced Member
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:39 pm

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by teb »

Nope, when I was a kid they hadn't invented Lego yet. We played with real toys - like dirt and sticks. Stuff that you could poke your eye out with (dart guns with the suction cups removed from the darts), stuff that you could choke to death on if you stuck it in your mouth (we just considered it part of natural selection), soap-box derby cars that somebody's older brother had built (why bother to block off the street? ...the cars will go around you). Water-rockets, or red plastic goo in a tube that you could blow bubbles with (probably horribly toxic). Any toy that couldn't send you to the emergency room or cause brain damage was hardly worth messing with. Real toys for real kids. None of this modern, nanny-state stuff. I still wonder how the hippy generation, with all of our free-this, free-that, do your own thing philosophy turned into such a batch of over-protective weenies, thinking that they have to legislate safety for everybody - prosecuting twelve-year-old kids for bringing an aspirin to school because they have a headache.......geeeeze.....
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by jimk »

Tell us how you really feel, Todd. :mrgreen:
I hear ya
JimK
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by ram »

Todd I agree... I had a Matel six shooter which you put sticky round caps on the end of the shell and a grey plastic tip would be spring loaded into the the front. And yes it did shoot them. Just like a real gun. And nobody ever shot their eye out or anything.... ahhhh the good 'ole daze..... :D
User avatar
teb
Advanced Member
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:39 pm

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by teb »

Yep. Ever try to poke your eye out by running with a pool noodle? Where's the fun in that? :mrgreen:
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by johnallg »

teb wrote:Nope, when I was a kid they hadn't invented Lego yet. We played with real toys - like dirt and sticks. Stuff that you could poke your eye out with (dart guns with the suction cups removed from the darts), stuff that you could choke to death on if you stuck it in your mouth (we just considered it part of natural selection), soap-box derby cars that somebody's older brother had built (why bother to block off the street? ...the cars will go around you). Water-rockets, or red plastic goo in a tube that you could blow bubbles with (probably horribly toxic). Any toy that couldn't send you to the emergency room or cause brain damage was hardly worth messing with. Real toys for real kids. None of this modern, nanny-state stuff. I still wonder how the hippy generation, with all of our free-this, free-that, do your own thing philosophy turned into such a batch of over-protective weenies, thinking that they have to legislate safety for everybody - prosecuting twelve-year-old kids for bringing an aspirin to school because they have a headache.......geeeeze.....
I hear ya, Todd. :wink: For a generation that was anti just about everything but sex and drugs, we sure turned into a bunch of legislating dictators. :roll:
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by jimk »

ram wrote:Todd I agree... I had a Matel six shooter which you put sticky round caps on the end of the shell and a grey plastic tip would be spring loaded into the the front. And yes it did shoot them. Just like a real gun. And nobody ever shot their eye out or anything.... ahhhh the good 'ole daze..... :D
You had one of those too? Well so did I! Great fun.
JimK
dlandau
Junior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 8:20 am

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by dlandau »

I still have my "Shootin Shell" rifle up in the attic. If Bloomberg knew that, I'd probably get arrested. :lol:
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: Two JangleBox'es in series ?

Post by ram »

teb wrote:Yep. Ever try to poke your eye out by running with a pool noodle? Where's the fun in that? :mrgreen:
Or the learning experience?

I ate potato salad that sat out most of the afternoon, climbed trees, swam in creeks.... I guess I'm a thrill seeker :o
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”