Page 2 of 3

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:50 pm
by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
steve...i've got and original cast tail piece in very good condition if you need one. pm me.

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:54 pm
by 86kubicki
PM sent!

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:24 pm
by 86kubicki
Deal pending - many thanks to Ronbo for being willing to part with this hard to find piece! :)

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:10 am
by jps
Very cool! Great to hear this, Steve. :D

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:15 am
by Wiker
You may have solved it with an original cast tailpiece, but.. :) Does the gap show on both sides of the tailpiece? In that full size photo, looking at how the strings run down the neck, it seems as if the tailpiece may have been mounted a tiny little bit off centre. Maybe it’s just the angle of the camera. If that is the case, shifting the tailpiece may cover the routing.

Re:

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:50 am
by 86kubicki
Wiker wrote:You may have solved it with an original cast tailpiece, but.. :) Does the gap show on both sides of the tailpiece? In that full size photo, looking at how the strings run down the neck, it seems as if the tailpiece may have been mounted a tiny little bit off centre. Maybe it’s just the angle of the camera. If that is the case, shifting the tailpiece may cover the routing.
The gap does only show on the bass side, but when I tried moving the tailpiece around to see if it would fully cover the route it became obvious that there would still be a small gap on each side.

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:36 am
by teeder
Nice snag, Steve!

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:45 am
by teeder
jps wrote:I finally got the measurements!

As best as I can measure the width of the old style tailpiece on my March '73 4001 is 3 7/8" - 98mm; the length is 4 1/16" - 102mm

The width of the tailpiece on my '98 4001V63 is 3 13/16" - 96.5mm; the length is 4" - 100mm.
FYI.
I have an original tailpiece sitting here on my desk and it also measures 3 7/8.

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:02 am
by rickaddict
WOW! What a score, Steve! Nothing is cooler than a walnut-winged S body with a hi-gain bridge pup and small surround.

NOTHING!

8)

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:58 am
by rickaddict
And the wood! :shock: WOW!

(drool!)

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:01 am
by rickaddict
Nice wood, Wood!

:D

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:07 pm
by teeder
Steve,

It looks like the bridge pu is black. It should be a greenie hi-gain. Do you think it's painted or replaced?

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:37 pm
by 86kubicki
teeder wrote:Steve,

It looks like the bridge pu is black. It should be a greenie hi-gain. Do you think it's painted or replaced?
I was thinking the same thing Kevin - I'll post some pics of the bridge pickup this afternoon and see what people think. I have a feeling that this pickup may not be original, but I'm not too concerned for this "player" bass.

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:05 pm
by teeder
I agree. Who cares if it sounds and plays good for that money. :mrgreen:

Re: Vintage/Modern tailpiece comparison

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:23 pm
by rickaddict
teeder wrote:Steve,

It looks like the bridge pu is black. It should be a greenie hi-gain. Do you think it's painted or replaced?

I saw that too, but didn't bother commenting. It isn't original. If it were original it would be green, have a skinny magnet and screw poles, and an aluminum back plate.

Still, I'll bet it sounds great!

8)