Page 2 of 2

Re: McCartney w/o flats? Sacrilege?

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 10:08 pm
by KenOnBass
As a compromise, I put Sadowsky flats on my Sadowsky P/J. Flats are comfortably and easy to play, but still weird to me. I can nail the Jamerson style with it and I like it for that, but on a Ric...still seems like an unnatural act.

Re: McCartney w/o flats? Sacrilege?

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 2:17 am
by scowboy
agree go with what works for you.

Re: McCartney w/o flats? Sacrilege?

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 4:08 pm
by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
teeder wrote:This is simple and I can't believe no one else has suggested it.
You need two basses! :mrgreen:

it is because it was simple, that no one suggested it ! :lol: i think we're a complicated lot, eh ?

Re: McCartney w/o flats? Sacrilege?

Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 5:01 pm
by rickfan63
gearhed289 wrote:I agree that you'll be fine with the right settings and palm muting. BUT - I have to say, there's something about flats that you can't totally reproduce with anything but... flats! Just last night I tracked a new song of mine with my one flatwound equipped bass - a '73 Guild JSII. I seriously considered putting flats on my CS, cause I really wanted to use a Ric on the track, but the Guild has its own mojo that I dig, so I spared myself the trouble. BTW - I am LOVING Guitar Rig 4 for recording bass, and I'm a hard core, miked tube amp purist. :D
+1. There is nothing like the sound of flats, played with a pick, through a slightly overdriven all tube amp.