[1] The difference in sound between the two pickups is more exaggerated than on the 4001. The Treble is VERY treble ( with the cap in series) , and the bass VERY bass.
[2] It doesn't' "growl" quite as much as a 4001. Blending the two pickups, to my ears its half-way between a 4001 and a jazz bass. Tone is so much "hollow" as having a bit less attack and sustain than the 4001. However, with a slight change in EQ it can still sound quite "squire-ish" with roundwounds.
[3] the neck on my 66' feels different to a 4001. I haven't actually measured it, but it feel a fraction wider, and I prefer it to to my 4001
[4] Balance is nice, and the body size is not a problem. weighs a little less than a 4001, but not by a huge amount
[5] Overall, it is a nice bass, but probably not worth the collector values it now fetches. I bout mine 20 years ago before prices went crazy and I won't any any current 4005-seekers by saying how much I paid. (of course, IMO no "collector" instrument is worth the premium attached for rarity. This is why collectors rather than musicians buy them. )
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:38 pm
by jps
[3] the neck on my 66' feels different to a 4001.
What is the manufacture date of your 4001?
I won't any any current 4005-seekers by saying how much I paid. (of course, IMO no "collector" instrument is worth the premium attached for rarity. This is why collectors rather than musicians buy them. )
You don't want to know what I paid for my 'Feb. '67 4005WB JG then.
My band is doing an outdoor festival in Hudson, Ohio the Sunday of Labor Day weekend, I will most likely bring the 4005WB, depending on the weather.
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:14 am
by doctorwho
Welcome, James!
I recommend that you check the Rickenbacker Conferences and Confluences section to see whether there is a get-together planned near you. Typically there are many models of guitars and basses on display that can be played, and you might then have the opportunity to play one.
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 4:09 am
by rickinroma
Welcome James
Just to give you an approx idea of the sound of an original 60s 4005, played through a vintage VOX amplifier, please search here amongst my youtube videos: www.youtube.com/user/rickinroma
There should be a cover of an old Who song, We're Not Gonna Take It/See me, Feel Me
It's not a hi-quality audio/video, therefore it represents just an idea, as I have said
The playability in terms of neck and comfort, compared to a 4001/4003, is probably superior due to its shape and slightly-less weight. The neck is really slim and narrow, you do not even feel it in your hand, and plays like butter.
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:36 am
by JM82
I 've seen that video of your 4005, all you videos are cool btw.
A fellow UK forumite has offered me a go on his 4005 already. What a great forum!
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 9:40 am
by jps
JM82 wrote:A fellow UK forumite has offered me a go on his 4005 already. What a great forum!
What, the lefty 4005 that Peter Levett has?
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:52 pm
by martin halstead
JPS:
I'm comparing it to a '78 4001. Having made the original statement, I put a set of calipers on both necks just to be sure its not my imagination. My 66 4005 is 2.19 inches at the 12th fret, the 4001 is 2.09 - only a tenth of an inch difference! However it FEELS wider......
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:57 pm
by Rockin' James
I've had 3 of these over the years, all from the late 60s. 1 a 4005 WB Mapleglo and the others a standard body. I liked the unique tone, a nice variable definition between the bridge and neck pickups. I didn't care for the size of the bass, or the neck setting far out of the body at the 20th fret, but i did like the weight, it wasn't as heavy as a P-bass or 4001.
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 2:35 pm
by rickinroma
Something more from my 4005...finger style
John Entwistle basslines are on the centre/right, I am playing on the left /centre of the stereo
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Thu Sep 16, 2010 5:17 am
by jfine
I'm a guitar player, not really a bass player, although I double occasionally--anyway, back in the '70's I worked with a bass player who had a 4005, about a '67, we thought. He traded his '62 Jazz Bass for it, and I remember him saying that the Rickenbacker had a little bit wider neck than the Fender (which he liked, as I recall). His biggest complaint was that the 4005 was a bit neck-heavy, and he had to hold it in place with his right forearm to keep the neck from heading for the floor. I played it a time or two, but I was sitting down, and it seemed to balance fine that way. Certainly a hollow or semi-hollow bass won't sustain as well as a solidbody, and that's what I recall about that bass. Overall, I think he preferred the Jazz, but when he quit playing in about 1977, he got rid of the Rick. He still plays guitar around the house, but I don't think he even owns a bass anymore.
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:22 pm
by beatlefan
I'm a little late to the game here...lol....
Well, I've owned two of these beasts, a standard and a double bound '67...and from what I can remember, the major differences were the overall length and the sound when switching between the pickups... I rarely used the treble position but the bass position brought out a nice growly tone thru my SVT....also , the necks were VERY thin and felt fragile, but were NICE to play....I sold both of them about 2 years ago. I would have kept them if they weren't worth so very much hahaha....
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:10 pm
by dricard
Francesco- didn't know you were on this forum. I absolutely love your videos, you have the best tone no matter what you are playing! Nice job!
Re: what are 4005s like? (really)
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:36 pm
by rickenbrother
dricard wrote:Francesco- didn't know you were on this forum. I absolutely love your videos, you have the best tone no matter what you are playing! Nice job!
Hi All - it's been quite a while since I've been on here, but I'd like to post my views on the 4005. I have three of them - two from 1968 and one from 1969. (I posted pics of my entire RIC collection here on the forums a few years ago....don't know if they're still here or not).
Personally, I LOVE my 4005s, but they are more of a "specialty bass" than an everyday one. (I play mostly jazz, so I use one of my RIC fretless 4001s for that). They sound great, play VERY well, and can come very close to the 4001 growl. I love their necks, and the 360-like semi hollow body style...old school 60s basses, for sure....true works of art and engineering.
To quote Ferris Beuller, "If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up!" (That is if you can find them, as they are quite rare).
Jim