Page 2 of 2

Re: Sound hole binding

Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:21 pm
by egosheep
jingle_jangle wrote:Yeah, about 10. :mrgreen:

Just kidding.
It only took Collin 10 minutes to take that binding off, though! :lol:

Re: Sound hole binding

Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:51 am
by Ontario_RIC_fan
jingle_jangle wrote:
file.jpg
No need for photoshop.

Is it a nightmare to do?

It takes, patience, binding, glue. Oh, and experience with Gordian Knots.
Bill did that one in 1972... It must have been quite a job...

B

Re: Sound hole binding

Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:40 pm
by electrofaro
jingle_jangle wrote:Ironically, I learned Gregorian chant as a grade school student (3rd grade), and learned that peculiar Gregorian notation then, too. Catholic school.
scotty wrote:Interesting thanks.
Indeed... I never learned anything gregorian at the catholic school I went to :shock:

I don't like the F-hole binding... just doesn't look right, you know!

Re: Sound hole binding

Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:43 pm
by JakeK
Wildberry wrote:
jingle_jangle wrote:Ironically, I learned Gregorian chant as a grade school student (3rd grade), and learned that peculiar Gregorian notation then, too. Catholic school.
scotty wrote:Interesting thanks.
Indeed... I never learned anything gregorian at the catholic school I went to :shock:

I don't like the F-hole binding... just doesn't look right, you know!
I snapped a pic of Collin's RoMo without the soundhole binding...

This is one he77 of a guitar. I never plugged it in, but it has one of the thinnest necks I've ever felt on a guitar, period. Collin has a holy grail, and I think it was my favorite guitar at SCARF.

Re: Sound hole binding

Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:54 pm
by electrofaro
JakeK wrote:I snapped a pic of Collin's RoMo without the soundhole binding...
The binding sure makes the f-hole more visible to the eye - compared to the state before I must say I'm undecided if it's an enhancement or not..