Perhaps, but like the Beatles, The Who, the Stones, etc., The Jam's covers did not sound that much like straight ahead soul and R&B. I used to play in a band, that did The Jam's version of "Midnight Hour." IMO, while you can hear the bare bones of the original Booker T & The MGs version, it's not a close copy of the song. It's faster, it's louder, and just plain more aggressive sounding. Also, is it necessary for a band that comes from these roots, to get closer to slavishly copying that style of music, as they become more able musicians? IMO, no. There is such a thing as having your own sound. That's like saying that a player who was totally into shredders (such as I was for a while in the late 80s), will eventually start sounding like Satriani, as they grow chops wise (I got sick of shred years ago). Players do grow beyond their musical roots/influences.Mateybob wrote:I find that a bit odd.360girl wrote: I kind of wonder if Paul didn't just basically take over the band, in the last year or two of its existence, dictating the stylistic direction it was taking musically. If you listen to a lot of The Jam's late material, it's very similar sounding to what Style Council did IMO. I'm not a big fan of it - it sounds too much like soul music for my tastes.
The whole foundation of groups like The Jam, The Who, The Beatles and the Stones is based on Soul and RnB.
The Jam's early set list from around 1976 contained as many soul/motown covers as it did original songs. As usual with these sorts of bands, the soul influence just manifests itself more within the bands sound as they become better writers and players.
Foxton was just as big a motown fan as Weller, even from the early days. I'm sure he was more than happy to go with the soul direction.
Buckler likes French Polishing and hitting things badly out of time.
Bucker was a basic drummer at best, but while Foxton is no Geddy Lee, or Chris Squire, he's certainly not as limited as say a hairband bassist like Nikki Sixx of Motley Crue.

