Page 2 of 3
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 10:30 pm
by Tarrbot
Works for me.
I still like the unbound bodies better, no matter what it's called.
Esses? We don't need no stinkin' esses.
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 10:35 pm
by rickenbrother
The 4004 is the modern day S!
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:15 pm
by bassduke49
weemac wrote:The RM1999 is not really an "S" either...
emac.
Well, not all "S" are RM1999, but all RM1999 are technically 4000+1 (also known as 4001S).
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:03 am
by weemac
bassduke49 wrote:weemac wrote:The RM1999 is not really an "S" either...
emac.
Well, not all "S" are RM1999, but all RM1999 are technically 4000+1 (also known as 4001S).
My brain hurts!
emac.
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:16 am
by s4001
Whatevs...
YESSSSSS!!!!!!!!
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:49 am
by weemac
rickenbrother wrote:The 4004 is the modern day S!
I agree, which is why I don't think there will be another RM1999 style reissue for a while.......
I think a Transgreen 4004 with the two piece narrow neck is just about the only one I could not resist now.....
emac.
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:17 pm
by rickaddict
I propose that the RM1999 and the 4008 should have
honorary S status!
All those in favor say aye...
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:16 pm
by teeder
i
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:22 pm
by scotty
T.A.R. wrote:Sweet!
+1
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:20 pm
by weemac
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:56 pm
by johnallg
Hai!
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:13 am
by jimk
ay, yai, yai,
JimK
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:36 am
by rickenbrother
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:04 am
by weemac
jimk wrote:ay, yai, yai,
JimK
One vote per person please...
emac.
Re: "Three of these things belong together"
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:57 pm
by johnhall
hieronymous wrote:I don't want to be a spoil-sport, but I don't think that the 4008 is technically an "S". It looks like one, but there isn't an S in the name and it has binding on the neck (despite the dot markers & lack of binding on the body) and it has both mono and stereo outputs.
The 1986 and 1991 catalogs disagree with you:
http://www.rickenbacker.com/catalog_pos ... ter_p6.jpg
http://www.rickenbacker.com/catalog_pos ... ter_p5.jpg
Still, the neck binding on that is an anomaly.
